Compare The Washington Post vs Marshall Cavendish Int BETA

See how working at The Washington Post vs. Marshall Cavendish Int compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at The Washington Post vs. Marshall Cavendish Int. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
The Washington Post company icon

The Washington Post

Employee Ratings

  • The Washington Post scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.5
(based on 380 reviews)
The Washington Post employees rated their Overall Rating 2.7 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
1.8
(based on 32 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
4.2
The Washington Post employees rated their Career Opportunities 2.5 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
1.7
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
4.0
The Washington Post employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 1.8 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
2.2
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
4.1
The Washington Post employees rated their Work-life balance 2.0 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
2.1
Senior Management
Senior Management
4.0
The Washington Post employees rated their Senior Management 2.5 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
1.5
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
4.5
The Washington Post employees rated their Culture & Values 2.9 higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
1.6
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
The Washington Post Ceo Frederick J. Ryan Jr.
98%
98%Frederick J. Ryan Jr.
The Washington Post employees rated their CEO Approval 81% higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
Marshall Cavendish Int Ceo Guan Heng Ling
17%
17%Guan Heng Ling
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
94%
The Washington Post employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 81% higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
13%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
90%
The Washington Post employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 87% higher than Marshall Cavendish Int employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
3%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
There are no salaries matching this company.
Salaries for similar jobs
Editor5 Salaries
S$2,500/mo
Assistant Senior Editor4 Salaries
S$3,450/mo
Executive1 Salaries
S$2,800/mo

What Employees Say

  • "Work life balance" was the most mentioned Pro at The Washington Post.
  • "Newsroom" was the most mentioned Con at The Washington Post.
Pros
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 29 reviews)
"Journalism"(in 23 reviews)
There aren't enough reviews matching this company to generate pros and cons.
Cons
Cons
"Newsroom"(in 18 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 13 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - Designer

I have been working at The Washington Post full-time

Pros

The Washington Post continues to expand as a company, and with that you get the chance to grow in your career. There are many opportunities and no day looks the same.

Cons

Hours are inconsistent and you are at the mercy of the news cycle.

"Executive"29 Dec 2019

Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

I worked at Marshall Cavendish Int full-time

Pros

A great steeping stone!! Learnt all my sales skills here!

Cons

Leaves are in fixed periods

Job Postings