CAM Properties Reviews

2.7

33% would recommend to a friend

(14 total reviews)

Mike Osselaer

Not enough data to show CEO approval

33% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

14 reviews
1.0
15 Jun 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some genuinely nice people working there. Expectations for property staff is low (only a pro if you're the property staff)

Cons

Where do I begin? The CEO is unprofessional, calls employees/residents/vendors/clients vulgar names when he's upset, which happens a lot. I witnessed him upset about some weeds growing at a property and he began cussing and yelling. This habit is repeated for other fairly minor grievances regularly. For a laugh, he showed me some inappropriate meme video on his phone of an overweight woman at the beach. The culture of gossiping about people trickles down from the top and creates a pretty toxic culture. I did my best to work through that and not let it affect me. I tried to create a culture of camaraderie with my team and was reprimanded for sharing too much (they seem to like to keep each property isolated so they don't know too much). Property managers are not expected to do much, which is a stark contrast to larger, more successful companies I've worked for. As a Regional Manager, I was completing the same exact work that I had been doing as a Property Manager at other companies. I tried teaching the property managers how to do some of the basic reporting and ways to make some operations run smoother but the managers pushed back and told me that they have never had to do any of that before and I was told by leadership to back off of them because "they're never going to be any better and they don't want to be better" (again, what I was told by the leadership of this company). During a management takeover of a property, I offered as much assistance to the PM as I could, and she assured me that she had everything under control, but actually was telling the Director of Operations that I was assigning her too much work and she couldn't work with me, so they removed that property from my portfolio. I was surprised when they told me, so I asked about the details as to what happened and found out this manager was outright lying. When I mentioned this, I was told that the manager has been around longer than me and that they trust her over me. Lots of family members get jobs for other family members and, if they're one of the longer tenured families, they do what they want and do not have to actually perform their jobs well (or at all). Vendors are often selected based on friendships with the CEO or the long-standing families. Employees are hired without Property Manager involvement, so an LC or MX tech could be randomly assigned or reassigned to a property without notice or input (a property manager should be at least be given an opportunity to interview their staff to make sure it's a fit for their particular needs). A conversation between the CEO and DoO involved the CEO asking how a new LC was doing at a property. The response was that he was doing great. The clients and residents really like him. The CEO asked for the LCs name and the name was stated... The CEO asked if we could get him to go by a shortened name because he didn't think that name sounded good to be representing the community. Did the name sound like it may be a certain ethnic background? Yes. Do I know if that's exactly the reason why this was said? No, and yet I can't imagine any other reason. During the same conversation, the CEO asked about the new Property Manager and how she was doing. Same answer, she was strong and detailed and the clients seemed to like her despite the fact that she's so young. He asks how old she is, we tell him, then he says that he thinks we may want to put a different guy there (his suggested replacement was roughly the same age and had zero experience in the industry AT ALL. (He had literally just been hired a couple weeks prior). So why the confidence to put a young man there with no experience vs a young woman with lots of experience? Your guess is as good as mine. Last thing, the employee handbook says you can be terminated for discussing your salary with other employees. This is illegal per the National Labor Regulations Board and Executive Order 11246. If you're considering working here and are reading the reviews thinking that maybe people were overreacting, I thought the same thing. I foolishly believed that I would be able to bring my years of team building and culture curating experience and have a huge impact in the small company. Run away.

avatar
CAM Properties Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We take all concerns seriously and appreciate the opportunity to address them. Regarding your observations about the workplace culture, we are committed to fostering an environment that values professionalism, respect, and inclusivity. We do not condone any behavior that compromises these values. Our leadership team diligently ensures that our workplace standards reflect our commitment to fairness and respect for all employees. With a team of over 350 employees, including many with tenure exceeding 10 years, we prioritize maintaining a positive and supportive work environment. Regarding your experiences with property management and operational challenges, we regret any misunderstandings that may have occurred. We strive to provide clear expectations and robust support for all team members. Each property takeover and day-to- day managements present unique challenges, and we aim to align our management approach with specific property needs and expectations. Our client-focused services and supportive environment for our team are integral to our continued success. We recognize that business practices vary across industries, allowing both clients and employees to choose partners that best meet their needs. Regarding hiring practices and vendor relationships, we uphold principles of fairness and transparency. We value long-term relationships with our employees, clients, and vendors, which have been key to our success over our 30-year history. Lastly, we appreciate your concern about the employee handbook. Compliance with labor regulations is a top priority, our policies align fully with all legal requirements. We regret that your experience did not meet your expectations and wish you the best in your future endeavors.
2.0
31 Aug 2018

Don't walk away, run!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent pay and the onsite staff are caring people.

Cons

Ownership is completely out of control. They are a lawsuit waiting to happen. If your a woman and need to be disrected, this is your place.

avatar
CAM Properties Response
3y
Hello. We’re deeply dismayed to hear this and we will continue to work hard to create a positive, supportive environment for all our valued team members. We always encourage people to reach out to their supervisor or to human resources if they ever have any concerns so that we can help address them.
1.0
11 Jul 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

none none none none none

Cons

Okay, there needs to be an easier way to leave a review if you're a job applicant. It should not be just employers who are permitted to do this. CAM reached out to me twice for jobs in their Phoenix area. They wanted me to come to their corporate office downtown for the interviews even though the job location is nowhere near that. I asked for a virtual interview because, you know, it's 2023. We should not have to spend 2+ hours of our working day for an interview. A virtual interview would have taken me only an hour. Interviewing at the job location, which was closer to where I was anyway, would have also taken just an hour. Candidates should not be expected to schlep all over creation for an interview that is not even at the intended job location in this day and age. Get with the times, CAM. When I suggested a closer/virtual/or alternative time for the interview (I am less busy after 3:00, but that's when I schedule all my interviews, so if you can't do a virtual one, expect to wait a few days) I was told "this is not the job for you" on my first application and "the position has been filled" on the second. In my experience, an employer doesn't fill a position before interviewing all the candidates they reached out to, so I am very hesitant to believe that they actually filled it. I think they didn't want to consider me because I'm not a doormat, and I ask questions.

avatar
CAM Properties Response
2y
Hello. We work hard to create positive experiences in every aspect of our operations, so we're disappointed to hear you feel this way about the application and interview process. We respect all our candidates and are sorry to hear there is a gap between your expectations and your experience with us. If you have any further questions, please contact our office directly. Otherwise, we will be looking into your feedback more closely and we're wishing you the best. Thank you.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 14 Reviews

Glassdoor has 14 CAM Properties reviews submitted anonymously by CAM Properties employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CAM Properties is right for you.