Micromanagement is worsening and ruining it here - Mental Health Therapsit NOCD Employee Review

3.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clinical care is great. I love my job and helping patients.

Cons

The micromanaging of top performers is the bane of my existence here. The management action plans are not helpful. Maybe they add 4% of value but 400% frustration. People keep leaving because of this and the company is well aware why but it’s getting worse. Nearly every review here has the same feedback and retention is falling.

Explore other reviews about NOCD

5.0
17 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- it really feels like I am making a lasting impact in the lives of people who are suffering - great support from my clinical manager, the training team, the NOCD community, the member advocate team, and IT - varied and interesting trainings and modalities - I definitely feel well compensated for my work and that my healthcare is much better than in prior positions - fully remote (I do NOT miss my office commute!) - coming from a community mental health setting, we just have so many resources available to us at NOCD; you don't have to beg and scrape for help or worry about the financial state of the program long term

Cons

- you do have to meet expectations for sessions in terms of the overall number (25 hours minimum per week) and targets for treatment improvement, and work nights and weekends (up to 10 hours). I don't mind this because I love the flexibility of free time during the day, the documentation feels much less intensive than at other jobs I have worked at (especially with AI tools), and I like the challenge- but I imagine it's not for everyone - the overall structure is definitely corporate at upper levels. I don't mind this because I got so burned out on community mental health and nonprofits, but some people might chafe against it

1.0
30 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I wish I could recommend working here because the mission is important and the therapy helps a lot of people. There are talented therapists and employees throughout the company who care deeply about the people they serve. Unfortunately, the culture makes it difficult to recommend.

Cons

Stephen Smith often talks about wanting to end the mental health crisis. That message rings hollow when so many of his own employees experience chronic stress, burnout, extreme micromanagement, unrealistic expectations, poor work-life balance, and communication that can be demeaning or dismissive. These are not isolated issues or the result of a few bad managers. They are the direct result of the culture Stephen has created and continues to reinforce throughout the organization. The culture revolves around keeping Stephen happy, and fear is often used as a tool to maintain that dynamic. Employees quickly learn that approval matters more than collaboration. This creates an environment where politics and self-preservation often outweigh teamwork, trust and effective communication. Employees are often made to feel that spending time with family, setting boundaries, or prioritizing their own well-being reflects a lack of commitment to the mission. For a company in the mental health space, the gap between what is said publicly and what employees experience internally is hard to ignore. It is also difficult to overlook the lack of female representation in senior leadership despite a workforce that is overwhelmingly made up of women. I do not believe that is accidental.

1
avatar
NOCD Response
4d
Thank you for this feedback. We appreciate you highlighting the dedication of our talented clinicians and the importance of our mission to provide impactful therapy. We hear your serious concerns regarding burnout, leadership dynamics, and the cultural alignment within the organization. It is troubling to learn that you felt the internal environment valued compliance over collaboration, or that setting personal boundaries was viewed as a lack of commitment to our mission. We also hear your specific note regarding gender representation within senior leadership, and we recognize the impact these experiences have had on your perspective of the company. We apologize for the frustration, lack of support, and dissatisfaction you experienced during your tenure. As an organization driven by a Member First mindset, we operate with a sense of Consistent Urgency to transform the behavioral health landscape and make evidence-based care widely available. To achieve this, we hold ourselves deeply accountable to outcomes and metrics. While this level of transparency can be uncomfortable and can sometimes be felt as micromanagement, tracking these data points is what allows us to secure payer coverage for specialty treatment. This is how we collectively break the status quo of misdiagnosis and ensure our members get the effective care they deserve. Our mission and our operational methods are deeply connected, and while confronting the areas that need daily improvement is challenging, it is how we responsibly scale our impact for the people who need us most. To address these concerns constructively, our leadership team is committed to evaluating our metrics to align with the well-being of our clinicians and non-clinical employees. Additionally, our People Team remains committed to refining our internal processes to foster a more balanced, transparent, and supportive environment for our colleagues. We strive to foster an internal environment that truly honors our mission from the inside out, and we will continue utilizing feedback like yours to drive continuous, meaningful improvement across all levels of leadership.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All