employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Renewable Energy Lab

Is this your company?

Surprisingly Poor Leadership - Anonymous employee National Renewable Energy Lab Employee Review

2.0
11 Jan 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people, mission, campus, location.

Cons

Bad senior leadership. Worst management I've witnessed in 20+ years at NREL. Top management is brilliant yet clueless. After a year, it's obvious that management does not care about employees. Director fosters a division between research and non-research staff (even program-funded staff like analysts and project managers) and refers to them as “carpet” vs. “tile” people (office vs. lab). He pushed aside female leaders to make room for male friends from his previous job and even invites only select male managers to extracurricular activities. To fund the director's pet projects, he cuts overhead expenses like early lab closures for holidays and treacherous weather. Another top manager says “dedicated employees will come to work regardless of the weather” regardless of the fact that teleconferencing and videoconferencing technology makes in-person presence unnecessary. Are we living in the 1970s??? Despite claiming NREL to be a model of sustainability, management can't get past this antiquated mindset. Incompetent and archaic HR leadership does not help, as it's sole mission is to avoid litigation. Meanwhile, non-existent management training and support fosters an environment of ill-prepared and ineffective middle management.

Explore other reviews about National Renewable Energy Lab

5.0
11 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth opportunities, manager was good

Cons

No cons come to mind

4.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredibly talented, dedicated, intelligent personnel who are highly motivated by the mission. Great opportunities to work collaboratively in a campus-like environment. Reasonable flexibility on work location, with options for remote, hybrid, and on-site work (depending on role and requirements). Good benefits. Fairly diverse workforce for the area (Colorado, USA) with many researchers from other nations. It's a good name to have on your CV if you're an energy researcher.

Cons

Funding is reliant on Congressional whims, and with current administration's aversion to anything renewable, sustainable, or strategic, the risk of layoffs is very high. Leadership team is mostly senior researchers who have peaked but still want to do research and are not effective "business" managers. Communication from LT to staff is pretty much one-way and not always transparent. Typical bottlenecks in getting LT attention. LT expresses interest in operating more efficiently but does not devote real resources to supporting that objective. Silos between business management systems persist. Risk management model is immature (projects, systems, institutional) and most decisions seem to be made based on intuition rather than data. Some progress on diversity representation in management but it's been very slow.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All