IPG Health Reviews

3.6

79% would recommend to a friend

(339 total reviews)

Dana Maiman

74% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

IPG Health has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 339 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IPG Health employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

339 reviews
3.0
13 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Women who apply for this job, ask for north of $180,000 and don't budge. The good news is that you are reading this review so you will know what salary to ask for if you are a woman. I told a male colleague who produces less than half the work I produce that as a Senior Medical Editor, I make too little money. He something to the effect of yeah right, he says then that he can't say what his salary is but that they are cheap and they are probably only paying me about $182,000. Reader, they were paying me $88,500. for a Senior. Also asked another man -- he was assigned to half the accounts I had. I would work until midnight while he went home at 5 when his half of the work was done. He was also making $88,500. for a senior.

Cons

They hire a lot of women because they can pay them less. Women, ladies, femmes, do't be fooled. They told me for 9 months that I'd get a base adjustment and it never arrived. So I got the woman's rate. They routinely point to the women in positions of power at the agency--right before they insert a less talented, less hard working man right above her at a better title and exponentially higher salary.

3.0
18 Jul 2022

The money is good but you will have to sacrifice a lot for it.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Pay is competitive if you negotiate well when you are first hired. -There is no pressure to return to the office except on occasions when it is absolutely necessary (eg, client meetings). -Big agency + big growth + big revenue provides a lot of resources and even the rare ability to fire accounts (VERY rare, but it has happened). -Proactive career management and equity, diversity, and inclusion are the usual buzzwords but there is a sense they are legitimately trying: women make up a substantial portion of leadership, a possible majority of VP-level and above positions. LGBTQ+ people found in every department (though, weirdly, not in creative roles). POC representation is still quite low as in the industry in general, but I know they are actively seeking. -Overall trenches mentality and general bonhomie on teams. There can be politics and bad behavior but no more so than I've found anywhere else or in any other industry, and steps are taken to place people in groups where they will be happy.

Cons

-Pay is NOT competitive if you don't grab the money when you're first hired; paybands lack transparency so it can be difficult to negotiate from a position of strength unless you have a lot of industry experience. I hope that recent NY laws will change this. -Benefits are mediocre. Health insurance costs too much and covers too little. 401K only has half-match up to 6% and three-year vesting. No real perks like you get in non-healthcare agencies, eg, no gyms or memberships, no free food (unless you scrounge from client meetings) or drinks, no fun spaces. -As in rest of industry there is a focus on client billing that puts burden on people to "find" work even when it is slow. General admin and any perceived downtime is frowned upon, even though company simultaneously pushes people to take optional training and attend seminars that they will then be told cut down on their "utilization." Bottom line is that they want you to do any development activities as extra overtime, except nobody gets overtime pay. (Is this even legal when people aren't managers?!?) -Also as in rest of industry, account services has entirely taken over the company--they have more power than creative, than project management, then support . They consistently overpromise OTHER people's time and abilities regardless of the brand. There is no pushback on ridiculous client demands at all, and they will throw anyone else under the bus if they are "embarrassed" when something they promise can't be delivered. -Onboarding, process and training are minimal except in certain departmental pockets. Of course, understandable since they want you "utilized" within days. -Work/life balance often nonexistent (see account services, above). -Project managers at a loss to manage projects because they have no power and their plans are constantly being negated by client+account--there's general sense from most of them that they have just given up trying.

1.0
4 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Private healthcare package (UK), great Head of Operations in London (he needs a medal)

Cons

Poor management, like a production line/factory, people are viewed as resource instead of humans/individuals, cliquey, SLT focused on their own gains and benefits: focus on their growth instead of entire company growth, poor strategic leads, poor division of teams (bias), ego-driven, broken “culture”, women are paid less for the same roles (from junior to SLT levels), poor talent uptake: constant lack of resource which puts insane pressure on existing employees due to poor/flippant/stagnant hiring approach and constant reliance on last-minute freelancers, long hours and low pay, traditional structure and brand offering: brand strategy only gets you so far in 2022, hard to get promoted (unless you are best buds with someone in a senior role), gentlemen’s club at the top: lack of diversity, lack of care for employees, misogynistic culture (give more room in meetings for women’s voices as men dominate the floor), empty/misleading promises, high turnover rate (at least one person left the company every single week), no understanding for internal developments needed to progress as an agency (too long and lost opportunities), fragmented teams/lack of consistent teams, poor processes that encourage poor outputs, poor technological support which adds pressure when working remotely, lack of innovation and new ideas, lack of transparency of internal developments (from internal teams and global), lack of collaboration and team play, acts like a studio for clients, not a full-service agency and thinks that the McCann name is enough to encourage talent: you need more than that. And collaborate more with other agencies in the McCann Health network instead of seeing them as competition: counterintuitive approach. Working in silos has never benefitted anyone.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 339 Reviews

Glassdoor has 448 IPG Health reviews submitted anonymously by IPG Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IPG Health is right for you.