Review of company - Intern - Hourly TruU Employee Review

5.0
19 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good to work. on latest technologies. Great people

Cons

None, it’s a startup growing at good scale

Explore other reviews about TruU

5.0
17 Nov 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The energy and passion at TruU is real. People are incredibly passionate about the products and are genuinely driven to build wholistic products for a competitive market. You're surrounded by super smart, hardworking colleagues across all the offices, and it truly feels like everyone is making a meaningful contribution. The work is engaging, and the company has a great outlook for the future. Best of all, the people are really fun to work with, which makes a huge difference. A huge positive is the leadership. The CEO has done an amazing job turning the company around, both in terms of rebuilding trust with customers, building a culture of building and learning quickly, and improving our overall perception in the market.

Cons

Because everyone is so passionate and hardworking, the pace can be fast and demanding at times. It's an exciting environment, but you have to be ready to jump in and keep up. (As with any fast-growing company, sometimes processes are still being defined as we go).

4.0
16 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The intellectual caliber across this organization is genuinely impressive — the depth of expertise among colleagues is a professional asset that is hard to overstate. The Founder and Chairman stands in a category of their own; the vision, integrity, and passion they bring to the company's mission is the kind of founding energy most organizations never get to experience. The CEO brings strategic clarity and a commanding presence that inspires confidence in the long arc of where the company is headed. Perhaps most meaningfully, this is an organization that invests in its people — opportunities to grow are real, and leadership has consistently demonstrated a willingness to give individuals a chance to rise.

Cons

The gap between strategic vision and tactical execution remains a persistent challenge. Too often, the individuals most prepared — and most eager — to drive operational change are not empowered to do so. There is a noticeable pattern of deferring to legacy approaches in contexts where change would clearly serve the business better. This friction is compounded by inconsistent communication from mid-to-senior leadership, which creates ambiguity at the team level and slows the organization's ability to adapt.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All