It was a two-part interview process. The first part involved meeting with two colleagues, while the second part was with senior management to discuss the capability framework. A positive aspect was that they provided the interview questions in advance. Out of 7 questions, they asked 4 randomly, which were behavioural in nature (e.g., "tell me about a time when xxx"). However, the inconvenience occured after the interview. After waiting for four weeks, they hadn't finalised the result. Initially, they mentioned it was between me and another candidate. Then, after a follow-up, they mentioned needing to review the budget. After additional waiting, they rejected me. It was later revealed they hired an internal candidate from the communication department, whose role was strategic communication. The recruitment process was draining, and it showed the disorganisation within the organisation. They should have prioritised internal recruitment rather than conducting the process in this manner. However, after reading other reviews, it appears I may have dodged a bullet.