Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at IQM Quantum Computers as 100% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Business Development Manager and rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Business Development Manager and roles were rated as the easiest.
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I interviewed at IQM Quantum Computers (Munich, Bavaria)
Interview
1. After submitting the application, a three-party interview is conducted with the CFO, the Education Manager, and the Technical Lead.
2. This is followed by a technical assessment.
3. Upon passing the technical assessment, HR provides a detailed explanation of the compensation package.
4. Once the candidate agrees to the salary and terms, the employment contract and related documents are issued.
5. Relocation arrangements are then carried out.
Relocation is fully covered by the company, and the benefits package is comprehensive, including support such as temporary accommodation. However, there is no ongoing housing allowance.
I applied online. I interviewed at IQM Quantum Computers in Apr 2025
Interview
The only phase of the process I got to encounter was a task to "... take a component designed in Figma and translate this into a functional component in React"
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Task was to "... take a component designed in Figma and translate this into a functional component in React"
I interviewed at IQM Quantum Computers (Munich, Bavaria)
Interview
Strong interviews, poor candidate experience: I was left hanging for weeks
I was referred in mid-December 2025 for a People Ops role by a former manager. The first interview took place shortly before Christmas 2025 with the Head of Talent, followed by a second interview on Jan 5, 2026 with the VP of People. Both conversations felt positive and engaging, which made what happened next even more disappointing.
After the second interview, there was complete silence for weeks. No update, no timeline, no next steps, despite multiple follow-ups.
About a week later, I sent a polite email to the Head of Talent asking for an update: no response.
Another week later, I followed up again and cc’d the VP of People: still no response.
Only today, around a month later did I receive a rejection from a Talent Acquisition team member, saying how strong my interview performance was and that they would like to stay in touch for future roles. That’s hard to take seriously when candidates are ignored for weeks beforehand.
I’m genuinely disappointed by how I was treated as a candidate. Regardless of whether the outcome is a yes or a no, leaving candidates in the dark after interviews for weeks is disrespectful and creates a negative impression of the company’s culture and ways of working.
What I would expect from a professional process (and what good looks like to me):
Clear expectations after each step: “We’ll get back to you by date X” and then follow through.
Responding to candidate follow-ups within 48–72 hours, even if it’s just a short status update.
Process transparency: who decides, what are the next steps, what is the timeline?
A fallback when things slow down internally: proactively communicate delays instead of ghosting.
I truly hope the company urgently reviews and improves its recruiting process. Great candidates aren’t won just through interesting roles but through respect, communication, and reliability.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell me more about your experience with international payroll processes.