I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Palantir Technologies (New York, NY) in May 2016
Interview
I originally applied for a software engineering position to which I was rejected without interview. Two months later the recruiter reached out saying that I'm better suited for the FDE role and that she'd like to schedule a phone interview. The code pair exercise was pretty easy and I enjoyed the conversation with the FDE that I spoke to. Four hours later I was invited for an onsite the following week.
The first interview onsite was actually through skype with someone in DC and it was another code pair that I thought went well. The second interview was more of a systems design type of question that I definitely could have performed better in. The third interview was the one that left a little bit of a bad taste in my mouth. The interviewer asked a very open ended question after glancing over my resume (he didn't know what he was going to ask prior to entering the room), and I attempted to identify constraints and whatnot but he wasn't terribly helpful. I understand the point of this type of question, which is to see how you answer a completely new problem, but I still think that my interviewer had a specific way that he thought that the problem should be solved without really engaging in much of a conversation as I attempted to solve it.
After the three interviews I had a casual lunch with another FDE where I was able to ask any remaining questions.
Overall i thought that the process and questions were very fair except for the one above instance I already mentioned. They care a lot about passion and drive to solve complicated problems and Palantir seems to be filled with the type of driven people that I someday hope to work with.
However, I would have appreciated a little more feedback than the usual you're not a good fit/other more qualified candidates given that I took a vacation day to go to the interview. When I interviewed at Google I received very detailed feedback that was helpful in my future interviews.
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Palantir Technologies in Nov 2025
Interview
You first do a coding challenge with an engineer and if that goes well you do the full round. The full round is two interviews. One is a system design interview and then a second is the learning interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
They give you a fake SQL language with documentation and ask you to use it to solve a variety of questions.
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Palantir Technologies in Oct 2025
Interview
1. Screening and role fit.
- Brief behavioural interview assessing communication, collaboration, and role fit.
2. Technical 1 - Decomposition
- Very high level system design (keep simple)
- Eg: How would you build a food delivery app?
3. Technical 2 - Learning
- Hard to describe, look to see how you learn on the fly.
- Seeing how you approach never seen code. It’s generally simple but requires more than 30 mins to fully wrap head around (which is the point).
4. Technical 3 - Coding
- Leetcode medium arrays.
- Basic coding but keep communicating. Not structured exactly as a leetcode question though.
In summary, the interviewers are looking for you to be very communicative. All technicals started with behavioural questions where they’re trying to grasp your personality and fit for the role. Talk as much as possible about anything. Have fun and try your best!
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Whats a recent example of conflict you've faced in your professional career?
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Palantir Technologies (New York, NY) in Aug 2024
Interview
Round 1: Online Assessment
Round 2: Phone Screen with recruiter (no pressure, just explain interests)
Round 3: Technical Interview under pressure. Leet code medium question. Program with engineer. 30 minute interview, 20 minutes to code so very tight time crunch.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Asked a Leet Code Medium, but had to read documentation under pressure. Was not as wholistic and supportive as other interviewers.