First call with a recruiter, standard questions and a walkthrough of the role. Second call was with the Chief of Staff and third with the head of Product. What struck me is that at no point we discussed product-related topics, engineering or design, etc. Besides the first interview, which was just a quick rundown of the role, the second and third interviews were McKinsey-style consulting case questions only, such as "You're the manager of a store, you need to increase sales, what do you do". The Chief of Staff worked for McKinsey (she made sure I knew this at several points during our interview), so I understand that she'd lean towards that, but for the head of PRODUCT to go ahead with a consulting case interview like this was a bit bizarre. I wasn't sure if they were hiring a management consultant or a product owner. It was a shame, since I was eager to discuss how to validate ideas, interview customers, build with coding agents and so on. Instead I got a load of questions directly from the book Case in Point. They also asked me to do a take home exercise, which consisted of building a report or presentation on a consulting-style question. I believe it was something along the lines of "You're working for a Latin American payment orchestrator. Build a presentation/report to present to the executive team on how to increase profitability". Still, I spent a few hours building it as best as I could. This was before the third interview. At no point during the interview was this report acknowledged. That third interview was more than a month and a half ago. I am still to hear back from the recruiter, despite of a couple of emails asking for an update. Overall, not a good experience. I'd expect them to at least send me a rejection email instead of ghosting me, especially taking into account the hours I spent preparing and interviewing.