*Provided more of a random verbal exam which had no scope or context to the questions being asked and he probably wasn't aware but he made some errors in the financial data provided in the questions. *I was mainly asked only open ended questions with no room to elaborate on the question (due to also no scope or context being provided to the question/another error) to show further technical application. *Questions were easy and was informed by another source that interview questions varied (were different) throughout the day which doesn't really make sense if you'd want to accurately assess and compare candidates, they more or less should all be the same question to some extent.