Acusis Reviews

3.2

51% would recommend to a friend

(53 total reviews)

KB Anand

67% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

Acusis has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 53 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Acusis employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

53 reviews
1.0
13 Feb 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Well, they have direct deposit at least.

Cons

Software: It doesn't work correctly, because it's been "adjusted" a few times too often. It will slowly kill your computer, it's riddled with spyware, and it doesn't count your lines correctly. (In the company's favor, of course!) Accounts: They used to have really good accounts, but most of the good ones have flown the coop, or been offshored to India and the Philippines. What's left are the dregs of dictation: Noisy dictating stations, ESLs up the whazoo, bad sound-file quality, and fairly primitive speech recognition software. QA: Nitpicky and punitive. They threaten you with termination for every misplaced comma or apostrophe. If you did the work right, and the QA in India changes it and makes it wrong, then surprise! You get the credit for the error. Team Leads: They are fairly nice, and easy to deal with, but when all is said and done, they answer to the company, and do things the company's way, even if that way is seriously flawed. So in the end, your team lead, however nice she may be to you over the phone, he or she will NOT have your back when QA is making your life miserable. Pay: Pay is TERRIBLE. Never mind what some of the company cheerleaders have said in more-positive posts about Acusis. The fact is, Acusis though not as large a company as the Big Three, it's modus operandi is exactly the same as the worst of the worst. When you go to work for this company, forget about raises. They simply do not exist. Instead, steel yourself for continual drops in pay. Sometimes the cents-per-line pay itself is lowered, often randomly. Other times. your line counts will mysteriously drop, even though your own counts have registered higher and higher. During the time that I worked for Acusis, they stopped paying for spaces between words (even though you still have to type them!) The same goes for headers, footers, capitalized paragraph headings, and some macros. As the line count minimum they require continued to go higher, they also raised their minimum error-free percentage to 99%. And this was expected to be produced within an 8-hour time period, because they don't pay overtime (though you WILL be encouraged to work it, but not report it.) This, in conjunction with the fact that work often mysteriously dries up for hours, even days on end, will be impossible to achieve. Perks: Almost non-existent. As above, overtime is not paid. Bonuses do not exist. Oh, they supposedly celebrate "MT Week" with what they think are perks, but it's merely a scrap they're tossing into a pack of hungry (literally) MTs. Instead of just giving each of their MTs a gift card or a small bonus, instead they'll have a few silly contests, where you have to answer MT-related questions. If you answer them correctly, however, you don't get your gift card then. No, instead, all you get for your efforts is your name thrown into a hat, where a very few "winners" are (supposedly) randomly picked. THEY are the ones who will actually get a gift card for a whopping $25. Working at Home: Many people see this as a plus, but I'm here to tell you it is NOT. There are many reasons for this (isolation, sleep cycle difficulties, and high utility bills, to name a few!) But the main reason working at home is not all it's cracked up to be is that you are totally INVISIBLE. You are just a number. Red ink on the company's books. A non-human entity. A typing-machine. A cog in the wheel. This invisibility and perceived non-humanity makes it far easier for this company, and others like it, to take unfair advantage of its employees. The other downside to working at home is when you finally decide to leave, future non-MT, on-site employers do not look with favor on work-at-home jobs.

1.0
27 Jul 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None. There are NO pros.

Cons

Over hire, left with no work, outsource most their work to India, left with crap work, worst of the worst, lure you with employee status, don't fall for it, benefits poor, over hire, leaves you without steady workflow, average pay 2 cpl after their penalties for the simplest grammar/punctuation/comma mistakes. This is the worst company by far. I have been in this business for 16+ years now and one of the worst companies I have seen. Recruiters lie through their teeth to get you on board to make their commission and once hired, nothing as described. They promised a secondary account for low times on primary, not so. They have 2 different platforms and main one they hire for is Editscript for a very hard to compete with account. MHHS; one hospital with 5 outsourcing companies sharking in same pool for work. don't fall for their lies line about 2.5 million lines coming through per day on this account -averages nothing if hundreds to thousands of transcription dipping into same pool and never any work. You will be lucky to work graveyard shift if even that and you have to be on standby nonstop to just get a measly pittance of work. You are not allowed to allocate yourself a work queue which means mgmt will be sure to only allow you to pull up one job at a time which leaves you idle for long periods of time staring at a blank screen. They are the worst of the worst and left me penniless. This is MT exploitation at its worst not to mention all their work goes to India and US gets the the Indians can't decipher. Heed my warning, DON'T FALL FOR THEIR CON (RECRUITERS). They should be sued to say the least as you will be working below minimum wage and don't think I am disgruntled employee. It is the absolute truth. I will stake my reputation on it and have documentation to prove it and if I could afford, would sue them out of wages for 3 weeks training, 3 weeks before that of committing to a wait to be hired, paperwork, all the headaches of waiting before start date. Lots of time and money wasted on them. I challenge them to prove me wrong. They could care less about you and they penalize for ANY blanks sent through. Their system is geared to rip you out of your earnings so MTSOs can profit. Don't know how they sleep at night. Lure you in with employee status, but believe me not worth it.

avatar
Acusis Response
8y
The Acusis pay model does not have a penalty system. There is a base rate of 4 cents per line for speech editing and 8 cents for straight typing. For lines that the MT sends for review, the line rates are reduced by half for the lines which are reviewed only. In addition, there is an incentive scale to increase the line rates by the number of lines produced. Additionally, Acusis does not use recruiters. The interview and hiring process is conducted by the HR department along with the MT supervisor. Work is not assigned to India based on anything other than client wishes. Many clients wish for work to only be processed in the US while other prefer using the less expensive option of utilizing our India based services. No We are sorry that your feel the way you claim but rebut your information as incorrect and false. Best of luck to you!
Viewing 1 - 3 of 53 Reviews

Glassdoor has 54 Acusis reviews submitted anonymously by Acusis employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Acusis is right for you.