AutoProtect Reviews

3.7

71% would recommend to a friend

(53 total reviews)

Graeme Nieman

78% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

AutoProtect has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 53 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AutoProtect employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Insurance industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

53 reviews
1.0
13 Mar 2025

Avoid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Team mates were superb Interesting projects

Cons

When this company has issues they get rid of staff. The South African parent company decided that the project wasn't going well so they made the whole development team redundant! When staff leave they are not being replaced This company does not treat its staff well The number of call centre staff staying is very poor Wouldn't pay for hotel for staff travelling to their Christmas party from Derby / Leeds offices!

avatar
AutoProtect Response
1y
Many thanks for taking the time to provide feedback on Glassdoor. I wanted to take a moment to respond, as I believe I can offer some clarity on the points you raised. I completely agree that our staff are our greatest asset, and we work hard to retain them. As we outlined with you at the time, we were clear that the decision came from the Company and was made after many discussions. We took the time to speak with everyone involved, both as a group and individually, to cover the business case and address any points raised. I understand that it can be challenging when the Company makes decisions based on the performance of a project, especially when you are part of that project team. I’m sorry you were unable to attend the Christmas party, which many of the Leeds-based staff were able to join, with travel and accommodation covered. Wishing you all the best for the future.
1.0
24 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good salary. - Free onsite parking. - Friendly people.

Cons

I was part of the Operational Excellence team who were responsible for the optimisation of operational performance. During the interview process, I was told that APG were about to go through a period of transformation across all areas of the business and the team were excited by the opportunity to learn, problem solve and create positive change. However, within a few weeks, after attending a few project meetings and being assigned superfluous tasks, we realised that there was no real need for an Operational Excellence team, as most of the work had already been completed by business analysts, SMEs and project/product managers. Disappointingly, the entire function was being mocked by some of the company, deemed unnecessary, with no-one (including HR) knowing what the purpose of Operational Excellence was. It was extremely disappointing given that I had left a financially stable company and secure role, to what I can only describe now as a sinking ship of a company (I advise you to read the reviews on google too). I reported into the Head of Operational Excellence, someone who lacked leadership, communication, time management and general people skills. Most tasks were assigned at the last minute with unclear briefs and unrealistic deadlines - continuously confusing the team and putting them under pressure. I was penalised for asking questions and suggesting ideas, despite the job advert looking for an inquisitive and analytical person. She always said she had time for the team, but she was rarely available or seen in the office, my first 1-2-1 was six weeks into the role. When I voiced mine and the teams’ concerns to her, I was met with “why didn’t you tell me sooner?” …again just highlighting the lack of leadership, communication and accountability you would expect from someone in a leadership role. It’s interesting to see that the role has now been advertised as a "process engineer" and also that other members of this team have moved on to better things. The reason I wrote this review is because I don’t want anyone to be fooled by this role, company, or the Head of OpEx, and to go through the same terrible experience as I did.

avatar
AutoProtect Response
1y
Many thanks for the feedback provided, it is always an opportunity to learn and I appreciate the time you took to outline the feedback. I do, of course take a differing view of the company that I joined this year and as Head of People I feel well placed to take on board the feedback and support the further development of the Company. It is a company that is developing and making an impact which is an exciting place to work with the change based on data and the amazing skills and ability of our people. The transformation so far has been amazing and the company has developed a more collaborative approach. I am sorry that you felt that the Operational Excellence team was not needed. That’s an interesting view, as we see the team as a key differentiation to other companies in our space. The information gained is imperative in helping us to improve the way we work and ultimately the remarkable journey we are now providing for our people and customer. We are very much a data driven company that has its customers and people as its priority. We obviously look to bring in the right talent and your background sounds ideal. We have good reviews from our customer Trustpilot scores (4.6/5 at writing this). From our people we have a Glassdoor core of 3.8 and Indeed 3.3 which we are working to improve and using the information provided as well as feedback from our people through the regular interaction we have. I am surprised to read your views on your management interaction as we have a high frequency of feedback opportunities with regular one to ones. This of course creates a high volume of information and we take the time to review this. Sorry to read that these regular feedback sessions did not work for you. I agree that being introduced to our values, people and products should occur when you start and our hiring Managers cover this at the point of starting. Like many companies we have a structured approach and the methodology we used is not for everyone. We do find that it works for us and leads to tangible improvements for our customers and people. Our focus on people is a key part of our way forward and we do have a programme of benefits that are reviewed annually. Tanks for your feedback on these. We do focus on the development of our people and we have been able to increase the internal career development for our people year on year. Lastly, thanks again for the detail you provide. It’s a shame that our working approach did not work for you and I hope that your next role provides you will all that you are looking for.
1.0
31 Jan 2024

Toxic Senior management and broken culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Middle management and below are good. We have regular reviews that aren't just about performance. Work events are a lot of fun. Nadine and Rappe are brilliant managers. Really approachable and fair. HR team trying to make things better.

Cons

Senior management are toxic, they don't "live" the values as they expect us to. They're arrogant and think they know better than the specialists. Won't listen to suggestions - we should just do as we're told. Don't pay people the right salary unless you're a favourite. Waste money on vanity projects that don't lead to anything. Won't get ahead unless you're South African. Refuse hybrid working because they don't like it, even if your performance is good. Talk about supporting ill health until you become a hassle and then they want you gone.

avatar
AutoProtect Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your experience at AutoProtect. We appreciate your positive feedback on specific managers and teams. We are currently reviewing our diversity, equality and inclusivity policy and processes, as well as our flexible working and hybrid working policies. We are updating our bullying and harassment policies. We are embarking on training all managers on our updated polices and processes. We are aligning these to our values, too. We take all grievances and reporting of bullying very seriously. We regret that you didn’t report your experience of being bullied. We would have done our utmost to assist you. We are cultivating a leadership development programme to measure how we live and demonstrate the values. We have implemented the Extra Mile Award to build a culture around our values. Our CEO is hosting a number of sessions to meet with people at all levels within the company to build spaces for open discussions and feedback. We have implemented a number of suggestions that have come from colleagues via our suggestion box. We benchmark all our roles according to the Willis Towers Watson matrix and review salaries annually – these are linked to the performance scores agreed to by both manager and colleague in our regular one to one meetings. These are in turn, moderated by the Revenue Committee as well as the management team. We support a number of colleagues who are ill, and we have engaged with a new firm of Occupational Health Specialists to assist us to manage this in a fair and compassionate manner. Thank you once again for your feedback. We wish you success and fulfilment in your new role.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 53 Reviews

Glassdoor has 55 AutoProtect reviews submitted anonymously by AutoProtect employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AutoProtect is right for you.