Babbletype Reviews

3.3

72% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)

John Feldcamp

79% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Babbletype has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 17 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Babbletype employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

17 reviews
1.0
16 Mar 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work from home listening to transcriptions and typing them. It is not very hard.

Cons

The pay is miserable. I was doing the translation/transcription role which already pays higher than the transcription role. But even so, the pay is still totally miserable. Although it is not hard, but it is very tedious. You have to listen to the audio recording for many many times just to accurately transcribe/translate it. Plus you have to note down all the timings. Not just so, sometimes the recording is very bad so you can't even hear properly. And if there is any slight error your pay would be docked in half. I once typed 19 pages worth of translated transcription only to get 20 USD in payment, cos apparently there were a few mistakes? I don't even want to email the company to ask about it--waste of my time. I just know that I won't want to offer my service for this anymore. This job might be suited for those based in the developing countries, so after exchanging USD to local currency, the pay might seem more reasonable. If not it is a complete waste of your time. 20 USD for 19 pages of word for word translated transcription? That took me 8 hours? Seriously. DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME UNLESS YOU ARE REALLY HARD UP FOR MONEY. You might earn more begging on the streets.

2.0
11 Jan 2016

The Babbletype QA Review Team Experiment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working as a QA reviewer at BT gave me the experience I needed to move on to other editing jobs. I also enjoyed the opportunity to work with people around the country (US) and around the world (largely the Philippines).

Cons

I was part of an experimental (as we found out) in-house QA review team to proofread transcripts for $10/hour (yep). About 8 reviewers were hired on. Management, as it were, was "senior QA"--three or four reviewers who coached and reviewed the review team. At first, everything was copesetic, supportive, friendly. Gradually, though, it became clear that both management and the CEO were more interested in fostering a competitive, micro-manage-y environment than really training and empowering the reviewers to their jobs. It was a real eye-opener how clique-ish people could become based on communication that occurred largely through Skype chat. Senior review would randomly drop in while you were editing (in Google docs) and comment on your edits. Later, management decided that some of us should take the senior reviewer seat for a day, so we all rotated through that--how fun and productive it was to have people who should have been your equals smugly "calling you in" to the Google doc you had edited to point out your mistakes! And it was such a great team-building exercise...not! Fact is, we all made mistakes. Not one of us was perfect. There were time constraints, deadlines. And you were taught as much--you were taught that while you should aim to make a manuscript as perfect as possible, perfection would not be possible in most cases due to time constraints. With that in mind, it was annoying to have someone go in and nitpick what was a perfectly great transcript. And I do mean nitpick. Every one of us could have nitpicked if we wanted to--again, a transcript is rarely perfect--but you know how it goes. Some people just love to micromanage, while others--types who aren't appreciated at a company like Babbletype--take a more balanced approach and enjoy encouraging others and acknowledging their strengths as much as showing them how to improve. What a concept! Oh, and don't get me started on style guides with companies like these. These are the sort of people who think they are so very smart because they know what an Oxford comma is yet don't know the difference between affect and effect.

1.0
23 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Consistent work flow if you're looking for about 5-10 hours a week.

Cons

The pay was NOT even close to up to par, I have been working in this field for almost ten years now. The communication regarding pay and work was also not good, the system is sloppy as well. Very disorganized.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 82 Babbletype reviews submitted anonymously by Babbletype employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Babbletype is right for you.