Catalyte Reviews

3.9

80% would recommend to a friend

(198 total reviews)

Matthew Derella

81% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Catalyte has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 198 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Catalyte employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

198 reviews
1.0
2 Nov 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Their screening process is based off of potential, not pedigree. The test you take doesn't care what color, gender, or age you happen to be, just how well you perform. As a result, the race an gender distribution far exceeds that of other software companies. Also, some of the best people I've ever had the privilege of working with survived Catalyst.

Cons

Last year there were three deaths in a company of around one hundred people. They were all tragic, but one in particular stood out as symbolic of what it means to work for Catalyst. He was a young kid who died homeless in their parking lot despite being one of their "Rising Stars". Many will point out he frequently said he was okay with living out of his van, but I was there when he switched from coming in about five minutes late every day, to coming in two hours early because he had nowhere else to go. In fact, I had lived it, so I knew exactly the pride that kept him quiet about his situation. I keep wondering if Catalyst had paid him what he was worth, if he wouldn't still be alive. This is a company that will bill you to their clients as senior developers, or leads at a rate of $86 to $120/hr while only paying you $15. You will often work with developers from other companies at the same caliber, doing the same job, but being paid three to four times as much. I guarantee this will eat away at you, despite the idea you're getting good experience for jobs elsewhere. Their training is about as smooth and consistent as headcheese. More often than not you'll get a former student desperately trying to do the right thing, but not qualified to teach at the level necessary to become a top developer. Sometimes you'll get a babysitter. On rare occasions you'll get a fully qualified developer to give instructions, but then leadership will do everything in their power to screw that person over so that they'll leave the company (after all, teaching isn't billable, so leadership treats said teacher as a liability). This leads back to the lucky training cycle being stuck with either a former student, or a babysitter, or sometimes just no one at all. They will also bill the state for workforce training grants and kickbacks, and once they've pocketed the money, leave you to rot despite their agreement with state agencies to do continuous training and job placement. After they've pocketed all the taxpayer money, then they'll think about putting you to work. Finally, the two year contract. I'd love to write a hundred page novel of expletives here. Instead, I'll point out Catalyst employs multiple law FIRMS for the purpose of processing, suing, and garnishing current and former employees. They genuinely have more lawyers at their disposal than tech leads. If that doesn't tell you what kind of company this is, I don't know what will.

3.0
10 Aug 2022

Great Aspirations, Questionable Implementation

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This review is based on my experience of completing full-stack development training. The overall mission is admirable: to find people with or without a tech background and helping them get the skills to work in tech. Lots of training in backend and frontend development if you choose the full-stack developer track; there is a growing list of other professional tracks you should ask about. There are kind, supportive people who want you to succeed if you take the time to network. You have the CHANCE to get practical experience in tech if there are clients available to work for. Option to relocate with some financial assistance if related to a client contract opportunity.

Cons

Promising there will be work once you pass training, but the reality is that there is a bottleneck in sales department leaving apprentices (hourly, contract employees) waiting on the bench (the waiting area before client); some apprentices were let go in the past few months because there were too many people on the bench waiting to get on client. Hourly rate of pay for apprentices is low given inflation (roughly $40K a year); depending on where they REQUIRE you to live, this may not be enough to cover cost of living in one of their hubs (i.e., Portland, Chicago, Denver, Baltimore, Boston) or close to client opportunity (e.g., New York). It seems excessive to expect apprentices to pay back $25K for cost of training if they leave within a couple months of starting training or within a couple of years of employment. Given the company does a markup to clients for contracting their apprentices and given the company is paying them below entry-level salaries, don't apprentices pay for the training in less than two years? Often unclear and changing requirements for apprentices in terms of the training you expect them to complete or the work you expect them to do. As an example, an apprentice may train to work in software development, but end up working as a help desk attendant...not what people signed up for. It often feels like the company holds all the cards with little collaboration or negotiation with their apprentices; the cost of an apprentice leaving for valid reasons within two years is a higher cost to the apprentice than it is for the company; to be fair, the company MAY let you leave employment without penalty for challenging life experiences (e.g., family medical issue). If you're considering signing up for training...be sure it's what you want before you commit to it. Network with current employees and ask every question you can think of.

2.0
20 Feb 2015

Novel business model but poor execution

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Coworkers who you go through the cycle with can become life long friends. An OK start to a new career if you're willing to put up with a lot of unknowns.

Cons

-There is a huge rumor mill and things get around fast. There really are no secrets here. -Management sometimes makes promises to developers and then does not fulfill them. This creates resentment and trust issues. With the rumor mill so large these types of stories go around quite quickly and are not received well. -The training is very inconsistent. Some groups have a great trainer and some are, essentially, left to fend for themselves. -Often times upper management does not deem training important enough to expend proper resources on which causes a ripple effect all the way through the chain of developers. This fosters ill-will and bad feelings not only from trainees but from those who have to watch the train-wreck knowing that things could be better if there were just more resources. -Wages are extremely and embarrassingly low even for seasoned developers. -All of the above issues create very high turn-over rates within the company at the 2 year mark (and sometimes before). When good people and good talent rush out the door it leaves a bad taste in the mouth of everyone left behind. -The contract creates an atmosphere of fear. Speaking up is always risky because of the threat of financial ruin. -There can be instances of extreme favoritism. -Very little transparency. -A very large lack of organization.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 198 Reviews

Glassdoor has 234 Catalyte reviews submitted anonymously by Catalyte employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Catalyte is right for you.