employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Cognitive Development Learning Centre

Is this your company?

Cognitive Development Learning Centre Reviews

1.8

11% would recommend to a friend

(2 total reviews)

Reviews by job title

2 reviews
1.0
5 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Honestly, there are no pros other than the location is a 5 minutes walk from the MRT, and great colleagues (but sadly everyone left due to toxic management).

Cons

The interview was sketchy as the interviewer (the Boss), did not answer my questions directly and would beat around the bush. One example is, Me: What is the salary you are offering after the probation period? Him: There is no guarantee but definitely will increase based on your performance. Me: Is there a range estimate? Him: [defensively disagreeing] There is no specific range, it can go up to thousands. Eventually, I found out they did not increase other previous colleagues' pay as initially discussed. And from his dodgy explanation, I should have known it was trouble. Another example is, Me: I noticed the work timings are not stated in the contract, only the centre’s operating hours. What time is our official working hours because based on the 44 hours work week, it will exceed? Him: We stated operation hours only because we are fluid in work timings. Me: But the classes start at 9am and end at 7pm. Do we need to start earlier or stay later? Him: Let’s not be calculative with the 30 minutes extra. Some days, we have ever allowed our coaches to leave early especially during the holidays. Later I have found out from the previous colleagues that it only happened once in the pre-covid period and ever since they are forced to OT (without pay) to finish work. Although the Boss does casually state not to OT too late, he did not understand the amount of work required by him to complete. Additionally, he would drag people into his office and talk to us for hours without a conclusion, taking away our time to do materials. Hence, the never-ending OT we have to do. Another example is, Me: Will training be provided? Him: Definitely. Me: Has there been any scenarios where children might have meltdowns and how do you approach it? Can you give me an example? Him: You will know when you are with us, don’t worry so much. Everything will be covered, we are professionals. I should have thought of that as red flags and rejected the offer but as a fresh graduate, I overlooked them - rookie mistake. On my first day, he insisted on going through the slides as part of the training plan. There were about 14 slides and he took 5 hours to finish them, only covering the orientation, i.e. mission, values, and vision. This training, a.k.a lectures, was given throughout 3 weeks of my service then. In his slides, there were quite a few misinformations and I had to raise them up with him. As a fresh graduate, most of what I have studied is still retained in my memory. When questioned, he would disagree immediately and tell me I was wrong without any evidence to support his explanation. And that is his idea of training. There was no guidance from any proper professionals catering to special needs children just him and his slides. Another red flag is his qualification. He mentioned he is qualified as he took an Early Childhood course and his company has been with him for 10 years. Little did I know that he barely knew any of the students there and had little to no interactions with them. He has Certification of participation and appreciation up on his wall which he claims is proof for a “qualified” trainer. He claimed he does not have to know the students as he can read everything up. However, whenever he tried to describe the child, he was way off than what I interacted with face-to-face. He tried to change the entire class schedule and wanted a “discussion” with the coaches. However, whenever we raised a potential issue, he would think we were against him and would not listen to any feedback. Even after showing him, his plans were not feasible, he insisted it was possible when he did not see the situation first. With no first-hand experience with children with special needs and with no knowledge of the fundamentals, he does whatever he wants without any considerations. All in all, the Boss works his employees in circles and blames them for not being efficient if it was not done right in his opinion. He tends to take all the credits when all the effort lays on his employees. The turnover rate is high and employee welfare is minimally low.

1.0
5 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In every organisation, there will be pros and cons. After all, perfection is merely a construct of the human mind. Perhaps from a standpoint of a businessman, everything makes sense. But as with every successful sales man, you need to be very knowledgeable of your product and services. Especially in such a sensitive industry like special needs, where you have the ability to shape the future of the children. As an employee teaching here, the pros are the supportive, empathetic and helpful colleagues. And to be fair, the employer is caring at times but in areas that are not related to work. I believe that he is not a bad person, but unfortunately, separating his personal beliefs from work is a luxury he does not have. Employer was nice to all staff initially, but his attitude changed drastically after some staff submitted their resignation and the treatment was very obvious to everyone. Everything just went downhill from there. Many people find this kind of environment unhealthy and left.

Cons

I would prefer to invest my time in an organisation that is professional in their operation, delivers their product and services as accurately as it was being communicated to their consumers and employees. I do not find overpromising your staff with a grandiose future and endless possibilities as a reliable management technique to retain staff. Sure, it may be enticing at first but in the long run, questions will be asked, staff will notice the inconsistency in your words and actions. Perhaps this is why the only long term staff is the receptionist. Our generation is not one who will settle and stay on for the ride, blindly hoping for change. Isolation of colleagues and bad mouthing staff who may or may not have left the organisation, which I find shocking and felt very uncomfortable with. I do not wish to engage or be a part of he says she says kind of work environment. If it is irrelevant to my work and career, kindly rant to your spouse, friends or therapist instead. I do not find this practice helpful in enforcing camaraderie in the office, coming from a staff who initially planned to stay for at least 3 years. Irrelevant remarks from the employer that I find very unprofessional. Employer tends to take things personally during communication, causing lots of hesitation and stress to voice out any opinion. As the coaches are most familiar with the children, he would express his willingness to have an open discussion to improve on their learning (which I appreciate), but there is a tendency to make conclusions and judgements before you even finish your ideas, or before he even tries to understand from your perspective. Instead of working out a solution together and engage in an open minded discussion, employer has a defensive nature and accuse you of insubordination (behind your back) when opinions are not aligned. As university graduates, we have high expectations of our future. Intentionally offending, sabotaging our work or participating in insubordination will never be any graduates' intention. And your coaches are your front liners, pointing finger and putting blame only reflects your management skills, in my opinion. As it should, the final call lies in the employer as the organisation is his asset. But personally, I believe that mutual respect and understanding are important factors for a successful organisation. Relying on your own bubble of knowledge in finance is not sufficient to manage an organisation dealing with special needs. It would be beneficial for you and the organisation to be receptive and open minded towards staff who actually study psychology and specialise in it. Deducted salary justified with the requirement for training, which I gladly agreed as I was excited to learn practical skillsets and apply my theoretical knowledge from school. As a centre marketing itself as a specialist centre targeting children who suffer from ADHD, ASD, MDD etc, the training provided was not on par with the industry standard. Training was merely definitions and theoretical knowledge that we have learnt in school. On paper, it may look professional and aligned with what other organisations are carrying out, but the credibility and quality is questionable. These are my opinion and experience from a perspective of an educational therapist/ teaching specialist. My goal was to stay for 3 years, but unfortunately, I decided that I do not thrive in such working environment. I hope things will change for the better as I want the children to be taught by qualified individuals.

Glassdoor has 12 Cognitive Development Learning Centre reviews submitted anonymously by Cognitive Development Learning Centre employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cognitive Development Learning Centre is right for you.