Unstable Leadership and Constantly Shifting Priorities
Pros
-A handful of talented individual contributors who genuinely try to deliver despite the environment. -Opportunities to take on responsibility due to constant turnover.
Cons
-Leadership is unqualified, insular, and routinely makes incorrect assumptions behind closed doors. These decisions have directly contributed to repeated layoffs and ongoing instability. -Success is not based on performance or capability — it is tied to proximity to leadership and the willingness to appease them. Those who challenge decisions or raise concerns are sidelined, while those who engage in performative agreement advance. -Delivery direction changes constantly, often without rationale, alignment, or communication. Priorities shift week to week, making it nearly impossible to execute effectively or maintain momentum. -A culture of micromanagement, including monitoring badge swipes in and out of the office. -“Unlimited PTO” is not truly unlimited, and the company’s claims of flexibility contradict mandated in‑office days, set working hours, and unachievable expectations. -Very political environment for such a small organization.