Edelman Reviews

3.4

60% would recommend to a friend

(3,498 total reviews)
avatar

Richard W. Edelman

56% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

Edelman has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 3,498 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Edelman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
13 Jan 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Really smart, strategic people work here, and there are some interesting disruptive and innovative clients.

Cons

Sweatshop. Everyone works 75-85 hours per week leaving at 7:30 pm everyday while usually "jumping online" later in the night and also taking lunch at their desk everyday. Employees are over worked and miserable, often answering emails and working from home on the weekends, in addition to the crazy week. Grossly understaffed. Besides they don't compensate you for the long hours. Terrible management in the Singapore office. They tell you to 'manage perceptions'. If you are looking for a good work life balance DON'T JOIN EDELMAN.

3.0
12 Jun 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Edelman is a best in class global brand - the number one PR agency in the world. We have clients from all walks of life, be it MNCs or smaller homegrown brands, with the scale and depth of global, regional or local work. The breadth of expertise is continually evolving beyond bread and butter media relations and traditional PR, diversifying our offering. The handful of tenured loyalists continually strive to inspire a newer generation of hires, and exercise a fair but firm hand when it comes to managing people. A recently refreshed leadership team has more hits than misses. There are visible attempts by the management team to alleviate what is an industry-wide issue such as long working hours and hiring behind the curve. However, results of these attempts have yet to be seen.

Cons

While we are we global agency, we behave like a start up with no funding. Tools and processes necessary to our trade that would aid efficiency and enhance our expertise are ignored or are left in negotiation phases for long periods of time due to budgetary concerns. However, these budgetary concerns are not reflected at the extravagant and sometimes unnecessary office parties or the show-and-tell efforts when global leadership is in town. The archaic financial system leaves little to be desired, with a finance team that is understaffed, overworked and unappreciated. Expenses incurred on behalf of the firm are paid out in two month intervals, and third party partners have gone for months after work is completed without receiving payment. We hired a team of creative and digital experts in an attempt to move the firm forward beyond just the PR space and into an integrated marketing offering. Yet, these resources are not shared across the office and when support from these teams are required, it always boils down to dollars and cents and which client team has the biggest bargaining chip. With over a 100 people in the firm, it is up to the management team to exercise discretion and to weigh each decision with fair and unbiased judgement. This has not been the case. It is increasingly prevalent that management has been blinded by hearsay, perceptions that are fueled by gossip and quick judgements, leading to favouritism for some and direct exclusion from the system for others. The lack of a HR lead and a department which is meant to oversee employee welfare is evident in the long and late working hours of all in the firm, with even interns working past midnight to complete deadlines as it is more cost effective. The existing HR lead doubles up as the CFO for the sub-region, an obvious but often ignored direct conflict for all employees. Remuneration of consultants, especially at entry-level, have not changed in the last 5 years, and is once again behind industry standards.

2.0
25 May 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- name and good reputation of the brand - good company to start out to build foundation in PR skills

Cons

- lack of work/life balance - people get brainwashed about how great this company is (it's good, but not the best at everything), especially when they first start out in the industry here - no transparency in career advancement - set in process - lots of people in management inflexible to other ways of doing things - some people get treated better - company is very bad at communicating internally (quite an irony for a PR firm) - managers expect junior staff to do everything and they just "review" - company doesn't give much room for mistakes

Viewing 1 - 3 of 3,498 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,486 Edelman reviews submitted anonymously by Edelman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Edelman is right for you.