Study Management Associate - Study Management Associate AbbVie Employee Review

5.0
23 Jan 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

AbbVie's Study Management Associate ("SMA") position is similar to what many other companies call a Clinical Trial Associate. A team is made of some Study Management 2 and Study Management 3 employees, who all report equally to a Project Manager. The duties for organizing and running the clinical studies are divided among the SMAs by the project manager according to their interests and the study needs. The vendors (outside companies who are paid to handle study duties such as patient x-rays, labs, etc) are divided among the SMAs. They have a lot of software systems to organize the clinical research studies, so the SMAs help with the clinical study software. The clinical research sites are divided among all the SMA2s and SMA3s, and it is the SMA's duty to keep track of the status of their sites and patients. AbbVie company is separated and silo'd, so the clinical study documents and trial design are done by different departments, and the SMA group also acts somewhat as a central communication hub to gather the clinical study information from other departments. The office atmosphere is nice, and they are also somewhat flexible about work from home.

Cons

some competition among team mates

Explore other reviews about AbbVie

5.0
27 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work. Competitive salary and benefits.

Cons

It has been a great experience for me.

4.0
8 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not bad as pharma companies go. Relatively good job security. A lot of lovely, smart and hard working people. Benefits team are generally receptive and benefits have improved. Less likely to lay people off than other pharma/biotech.

Cons

Your experience is almost entirely dictated by your managers. Adherence to official policies is super variable. Site is relatively siloed from the rest of the company, top-heavy, and academic. Too many PhDs, not enough entry level development to support projects and execution. Sometimes a lack of clear leadership or direction and bizarre "old school" pharma opaque communication. Very limited, once yearly opportunities for promotion. Bizarre pay /compensation penalties for taking parental leave that saddles two different calendar years.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All