Typical Staffing Agency, depends on where you are placed - Anonymous employee Adecco Employee Review

3.0
29 Aug 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depends largely on which company you are contracted out to. My experience has been positive, promoted many times over the past year. Work hard, look for ways to improve both yourself and the organization and your efforts will be recognized

Cons

lots of CYA rather than actual improvements and innovations. Difficult to be a change agent. Benefits are poor, no 401k matching, medical is also poor, benefits in general are not very good. Overall compensation isn't great either. Working for this company is a good way to gain experience and then find a new job as a salaried employee with greater long term potential.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Cons

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All