Toxic leadership - Anonymous employee Contact Energy Employee Review

1.0
18 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good flexibility, sick leave policy, great team members.

Cons

Management, particularly in IT, has gone downhill after the 2 restructures in 8 months. IT leadership have removed anyone who would voice concerns, and have left a bunch of yes men. CEO has zero empathy or sympathy for the general public, a true business man who only cares about returns.

Explore other reviews about Contact Energy

1.0
20 Aug 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

free fruit, health insurance, EAP, power discount

Cons

arrogant and entitled management, lack of internal communication, no support, disjointed

2
2.0
14 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genuine work-life balance — reasonable hours, low pressure to overextend • Stable environment if you’re looking for predictability over progression • Decent for someone early in their career wanting exposure without burnout

Cons

Upper management is old-school and resistant to change. Constructive feedback and modern ways of working are routinely ignored, and there’s a noticeable arrogance in how decisions are made top-down. • A clear in-group culture exists. A small circle of “yes people” sit close to leadership, and recognition tends to flow within that circle rather than being based on actual contribution. If your thinking doesn’t align with the dominant voices, your growth quietly stalls. • Recognition feels performative rather than meaningful. • Salary increases are minimal and promotions are rare — there’s no real career progression framework, particularly for QA. • Significant pay disparity between developers and testers. Developers are well-compensated; testers are not, and there’s little pathway to close that gap regardless of skill or impact. • Comfort-zone culture. People stay because it’s easy, not because they’re growing. If you have ambition, you’ll feel it pulling you backward over time. • Strongly developer-centric. QA is treated as a support function rather than an engineering discipline, which limits the kind of work, tooling, and influence testers can have. Bottom line If you want a calm, predictable job and value work-life balance above all, this can work for you. If you’re a tester with career ambition — looking for growth, fair pay, modern practices, or a path into automation/SDET/leadership — look elsewhere. You’ll plateau here.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All