employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CrossCountry Consulting

Engaged employer

Growth has impacted culture - Director CrossCountry Consulting Employee Review

2.0
17 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Invested in AI and are showing that in various ways.

Cons

I joined in 2025 from Big 4. I thought I was joining a better culture but unfortunately haven't experienced it. I am confident that they were once people centric but have been unable to maintain that with the growth experienced, ultimately appearing disconnected from their workforce. I am working a lot feeling like I took a paycut, don't have the benefits from Big 4 and don't feel appreciated. No real transparency in the shares program and how much you could actually make with a sale. Plus you are signing a non compete along with it which I was unaware of when told about the program. An ex colleage asked me about open roles here and when I told them about my experience they decided to not apply.

avatar
CrossCountry Consulting Response
3mo
Thank you for your candid feedback. Our goal is to build a high-performing, people-centered environment, even as we continue to grow and evolve. We recognize that experiences can vary, and we remain focused on strengthening communication, support, and consistency across the firm. We appreciate your perspective and your contributions during your time here.

Explore other reviews about CrossCountry Consulting

5.0
26 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with clients and helping project teams complete their assignments. Good coordination with different departments. Knowledgeable and professional employees. Recognition for good work and opportunities to take on additional responsibilities.

Cons

Too much documentation and reporting on some projects

1.0
6 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some colleagues demonstrated actual competence at their work.

Cons

• Senior staff controlled which people received high-profile assignments and advancement opportunities based on personal relationships rather than merit or performance • Colleagues outside the established inner circle were routinely overlooked for roles and projects while less experienced people with better connections moved ahead repeatedly • I brought relevant qualifications and took on difficult assignments, but my career progression stalled because I lacked the relationships that mattered for advancement • Career development conversations and advancement decisions happened without transparency or input from those being affected, determined entirely by people in charge • The organization made no effort to acknowledge the pattern of favoritism or implement systems that would ensure fair consideration for all employees

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All