Cloud Infrastructure - Cloud Infrastructure Architect Crossover for Work Employee Review

1.0
26 Mar 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, decent pay if you are not from the USA

Cons

fragmented communication, CEO does not care for the customer's and often mandates tasks which directly impact customers. Poorly managed teams. Onboarding is a nightmare and everyone is pushed beyond acceptable measures. No career growth. Too many people not knowing what is really going on, and finding out info become a nightmare. Also very invasive time tracking software that takes a photo of you and logs your key strokes/mouse activity. Very limited innovation

avatar
Crossover for Work Response
9y
Thanks for your feedback. We are committed to creating a comfortable, transparent and collaborative environment so we are disappointed to hear about some of your experiences. We value and consider all feedback and we'll continue to find ways to improve but we wanted to address a couple of your specific concerns here. We are sorry to know about your impression of Our CEO Andy Tryba as someone who doesn't care about the customers. We hope you got a chance to know him, his goal as well as his vision, by then you will completely have different thoughts. On Career growth, we are currently formulating a model on how our workers can choose their path for advancement. It is in the works and will be rolled out next quarter. Currently, we are providing online learning via our partner Treehouse to everyone who want to enhance their skills. We have several internal communication which is used by everyone like Skype, Slack, Hangouts, Go To Meeting, Zoom and others. And we also have all forms of Social Media, as one of our goals for 2017 is to boost engagement among our global workers. Also, we do not see our top performers complain about Worksmart, which makes us believe that the product is perfectly crafted for remote work. Lastly, we only hire the best of the best globally, thus we are confident that we have the best Managers running our teams. If you have any specific feedback or suggestions that you feel may help, please send is an email to feedback@crossover.com. We appreciate your time and effort for letting us know your experience and observation. Regards.

Explore other reviews about Crossover for Work

5.0
26 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great company to work for, salary on time

Cons

Demanding work and expects excellence

2
avatar
Crossover for Work Response
8mo
Glad to hear it’s a great fit and that pay’s been smooth. And yes—the bar is high by design. Thanks for the 5 stars and for leaning into the challenge.
2.0
30 Jul 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Crossover does require work from home. For many, this is a good thing and, for me, helped productivity. The salary is good, but depending upon your country's tax situation it might not be as good as it seems on the surface.

Cons

Where do I start? I tried to be objective with my 2-star rating; Crossover isn't unethical or stealing from their employees or anything like that. However, for a seasoned professional, be warned... I joined in one of the Very High Dollar executive-level positions being driven by their desire to acquire 50+ companies in the near term. I'm in the US. As such (and I knew this going in), the tax consequences for being a contractor are non-trivial. There's also the consideration that you must fund any perks yourself - healthcare, retirement, etc. While the salary is generous enough to do that, it's not as shiny as it seems on the surface. Your mileage may vary depending upon your home country. What I really disliked: Constant tracking/ justification of work stream. Seriously. As others have pointed out, it's difficult to actually *get* credit for a full work week without working extra. Especially in some of the higher-level, more 'creative' positions such as architect, product management, etc. there's minimal or no opportunity to review or think over things. For me, I work in bursts followed by small distractions in which I'm running the problems in the background of my thoughts. A variety of coworkers and management in my history have almost universally commented about the volume of good work I produce. Even my peers at Crossover had no problem with the quantity or quality of my production. However, their tracking software and systems simply don't credit anything other than linear, constant "work". This was bad for me, resulting in me working extra, reworking things as I attempting to change my processes, "faking" it, or simply working longer to attempt to make my hours. I also felt bad for some of the more junior or "factory" positions. It really is tracked by the minute, with lots of incentive to find "problems" with productivity. This is really a thinly-veiled method of wringing blood out of a turnip, by finding flaws or gaps and essentially docking pay. Yeah, the salaries are good but the amount of ancillary work that goes into making "real" hours is awful, and I felt like a chump contributing to it. I had to quit for my sanity.

1585
avatar
Crossover for Work Response
7y
We appreciate your review. Our wages are paid in USD, so it's not going to be as competitive in high tech markets like San Francisco or Boston in the United States where software development is ultra-competitive. However, wages for the same jobs are very competitive in other US cities and outside the US. Sometimes these wages can be 5-6x the local average. Our business model is unique and isn't for everyone. We aren't trying to be like everyone else. The future of work is being redefined. We pride ourselves in being a pioneer in this new paradigm. If you want to know more about this work model, you can read about it here: https://medium.com/@crossoverforwork/the-factory-model-enabling-massive-scale-across-business-functions-98b18ad574f8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All