Great place to work. - Engineer Crown Castle Employee Review

5.0
30 Sept 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great pay, values, management team, and the company really seems to care about the employees. Great business model as well.

Cons

My only complaint is that many of the middle managers are static so there isn't many options for growth within your own team. You have to look outside your team of upward growth.

avatar
Crown Castle Response
4y
Thank you for taking the time to write this review and for your question. We believe that growing our business requires the best team, and that’s why we open positions to both internal and external candidates. We also invest in our teammates so that they can continue to learn and grow their careers. To learn more about growth opportunities available, please feel free to reach out to MyExperience@crowncaslte.com and a member of our team will be in touch.

Explore other reviews about Crown Castle

5.0
23 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work. Although there has been a lot of change over the past few years, I feel the company is back on track. Culture has been dramatically improved.

Cons

Not much at this time. Still lots of change ahead though as the company transforms into a tower focused company.

1.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending on who is running your team (I’ve had 3 different team leads in the 3 years that I’ve been a full time employee,) some have provided great mentoring, and have taught me a lot.

Cons

Job security is extremely unstable, and employees often feel like they are one decision away from becoming part of another layoff statistic. In my experience, women were not always treated equitably compared to their male counterparts, depending heavily on the leadership structure within the department. The company also showed limited willingness to accommodate health conditions, often searching for loopholes to minimize support, assistance, or benefits during times when employees and their families needed them most. Leadership roles often felt transactional and tied directly to the company’s immediate operational goals. For example, when a department needed growth, leadership would bring in individuals with strong industry relationships, connections, and expertise to help expand profitability and establish the department. However, once those goals were achieved and the leader’s network or strategic value had been fully utilized, the company would frequently move on from them—either through reassignment or termination—in favor of the next person who fit the company’s evolving objectives. Overall, the culture created an environment where many employees felt expendable rather than valued long-term.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All