Growing Company w/ Great People - Operations Devoted Health Employee Review

5.0
17 Dec 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Prefacing this with those who might be skeptic of the company and/or reviews on Glassdoor - I don't typically write reviews and there is no incentive provided for writing this. As someone who was hesitant to join, I'm really happy I did - it has been refreshing to be part of a team that has exceeded my expectations both at an individual contributor level as well as a company at large. - Working with smart, down-to-earth people - Start-up feel (despite being a larger company now) - Growing company (actually growing and making a positive change for those under the Devoted wing) - Strong leadership with a transparent plan thru 2030 - Healthcare Benefits are pretty great - Good work-life balance (we have our busy seasons but people are all pretty mindful and respectful about time away from work).

Cons

Not really cons as much as they are growing pains - Things can change rather fast so it might be difficult for those accustomed to more structure - Healthcare benefits are awesome but would be nice to have some more perks

Explore other reviews about Devoted Health

5.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Cons

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3.0
4 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Cons

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All