employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Distress Centre Calgary

Is this your company?

DCC - Anonymous employee Distress Centre Calgary Employee Review

1.0
28 Aug 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

DCC is a nonprofit org in mental health sector. It has been there for over half century with a solid foundation built by previous executive teams and board. The office is located in downtown, so the transportation is convenient. The benefits are good (but employees have to pay 50%).

Cons

DCC’s wages (salaries) for frontline workers are competitive within the market, but the market rates themselves are low. The wages for non-frontline positions are even lower. The employee turnover rate is high for both frontline and non-frontline staff. The management team is dysfunctional. While DCC’s core values emphasize preventing mental crises and suicide, many employees, particularly those in management, appear to be very depressed, tired, numb, and down. Although management emphasizes “care” for people, this care is more often discussed in meetings than translated into monetary or other tangible support for employees.

Explore other reviews about Distress Centre Calgary

3.0
15 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, we can work remotely or onsite

Cons

The CEO is disrespectful to certain departments. The management team is inexperienced and has no knowledge of how to treat people with respect. Used to be a great place to work but in the last 6 months have been terrible

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you are Canadian born or fit the organization’s visible minority DEI categories, this can be an excellent place to start your career. There is initial training, and the real learning comes from speaking with service users. The moments when you can genuinely support someone in crisis are deeply meaningful and rewarding. From the outside, this environment has the potential to be exceptional.

Cons

My experience as a white immigrant with an accent was markedly different. I consistently felt like an outsider who did not fit any of the organization’s DEI boxes, and this shaped how I was perceived and treated. Feedback was often belittling, inconsistent, or delivered without clear documentation. Expectations shifted without warning. Concerns were reframed rather than addressed. The contrast between how included some staff felt and how excluded others were was stark. This created a two tier experience: those who fit the preferred categories often thrived, while those in the “middle space” — not Canadian born, not visibly diverse, and not protected by any category — faced disproportionate scrutiny and marginalization.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All