A mixed picture... - IS Systems Business Analyst Eastman Kodak Employee Review

4.0
15 Jul 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you are in the part of the company that is growing: - there are exciting new business opportunities - management is interested and listening; genuine interest in regaining workforce trust and morale - you will have access to more resources - priority given to making effective positive changes If you are looking for a place to settle down (Rochester, NY): - you will have a short commute (apparent 25 min average) - diversity of housing options, relatively affordable - if you're into golf, this is the place - Toronto is 3hr. away - moderate climate (except for the occasional blizzard)

Cons

Generally: - under-funded development - over-engineered processes - we sell profitable businesses and technology - "everyone counts; some people just count more than others" - we are far from the "100 Best Places to Work" list - outsourced & contracted services often not interested in excellence - special interest groups thrive If you are in the part of the company that is not growing: - you are managing a business to squeeze out cash - innovation is not welcome - you will work in a culture of deprivation Living in Rochester: - Winter usually runs from December through April - New York taxes and Albany neglect

Explore other reviews about Eastman Kodak

5.0
31 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people to work with. Enjoyed my time there, left for a better opportunity.

Cons

Building is a little out dated.

2.0
23 Dec 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To be fair, there are smart, capable people here, and the Kodak name still opens doors. But culture and execution matter more than branding. Without clarity, trust, and leadership engagement, even good ideas struggle. I don’t regret the experience as it was instructive. But if you’re considering joining, ask very specific questions about role boundaries, feedback cadence, and how decisions actually get made. Don’t confuse constant motion with real progress.

Cons

Working at Kodak was an eye opening experience in how large, legacy organizations try to reinvent themselves while still dragging along all the habits that made reinvention necessary in the first place. It often felt like roles were constantly shifting, ownership was unclear, and people were operating on instinct rather than alignment. There was a lot of activity, plenty of meetings, and very little agreement on who actually owned what. One colleague in particular somehow ended up doing several jobs at once. That may sound impressive, but in practice it created confusion and friction. When one person tries to be everything, it leaves everyone else in an awkward and unnecessary position.Leadership was mostly absent until it wasn’t. There was also a noticeable top down culture. Certain personalities didn’t invite discussion so much as compliance. Offering alternative viewpoints wasn’t encouraged, and collaboration tended to flow in one direction. Confidence often crossed into condescension, which made an already challenging environment harder than it needed to be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All