Focus on the future - Technology Director Ellucian Employee Review

4.0
16 Jul 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth has been good in past few years, the company has started to pay attention to internal issues and their people, strong sales focus, products greatly improving

Cons

Mergers create constant climate of cultural unrest; systems still reflect 'them' and 'us' - technology management teams are providing the most sustainable profit margins but are not well understood, supported or represented in the corporate structure; the sales and consulting side constantly undermines and vampirizes from TM and the higher ups seem to only emphasize product sales. Non-datatel people outside of fairfax feel excluded and marginalized. Divisions compete with each other. Company is still 'storming' and morale is low. Great ideas tend to surface, momentum gets started, and then efforts get abandoned and the company shifts to the next new shiny thing without following through to completion on core business processes. We sell 'best practices' - let's start using them!

Explore other reviews about Ellucian

5.0
9 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Consistently one of the highest-rated areas Flexible schedules and remote work options are common

Cons

frequent changes in priorities, Strategic direction isn’t always consistent

1.0
14 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ellucian had some genuinely brilliant people. I mean real talent. Smart engineers, sharp support people who could look at a broken system and somehow see both the problem and the political disaster hiding behind it. A lot of people there cared deeply about higher ed. They understood that colleges and universities are not just “customers.” They are institutions trying to keep students moving, faculty supported, and operations alive with systems that often looked held together by duct tape, PLSQL scripts, and institutional trauma.

Cons

Then there was the C-suite. Every company has executives. That’s normal. But this group often felt less like corporate stewards and more like LinkedIn influencers who accidentally wandered into an ERP company. They seemed distant. Aloof. Not deeply engaged with the actual work, the clients, or the people carrying the weight. There was a lot of executive polish, a lot of corporate language, a lot of “vision,” but not always the kind of grounded leadership that makes employees say, “I trust these people with the future of the company.” At times, it felt like the people closest to the customers understood the business better than the people paid the most to lead it.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All