Pros
The staff, entry level and slightly above were great to work with. Office is nice, but always empty, as leadership fail to lead by example and are hungover "WFH" on a Friday (not online until 11 am). This can be viewed as a pro as some leadership only got in the way.
Cons
1. Three of the executives do not have external experience in running a company, one in particular should not be an executive as the business performance decreased under their stewardship. 2. The company lost their products (as determined by the FCA) which restricted incentives for staff and there was zero compensation offered. Staff lost part of their salary because of the management's inability to manage cash, and then staff were lied to about the restriction. 3. There are too many cash "kick backs" for internal staff to put on a brave face, instead of fixing the underlying problem. Some of these reviews, those that are obviously too positive, are a testament to that. 4. The technology failings of legacy equipment leave too much room for error such as missed payments, mis-allocation of client funds, lost client funds, forward contract positions not closed correctly and the client wearing the loss, and breaches of sensitive client data to external third parties such as affiliates.