It's a toxic environment where careers die - Validation Engineer Genentech Employee Review

1.0
6 Nov 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A position at Genenetech pays pretty well.

Cons

Genentech and other bay area based biotech firms carry a reputation of being discriminatory and harassing toward women and older employees. To top it off, now that they are owned by Roche, there's a chance Roche-based (foreign, German) employees wind up being in project management positions in which they resort to old school yelling. It is such a wasteful company, there are so many upper executive level people and headquarters located in Switzerland that seem to contribute to nothing except too many odd hour tele-video meetings and higher drug prices with their salaries...if Genentech/Roche would force those people out instead of older employees wanting to wait a couple of years before retirement they would cut costs and probably get the drugs out quicker. What is even funny, you would think working for a bio-pharmacy-medical company you would get free healthcare with all the money they make, but you do not. Their cheapest, base level HMO is more expensive than Intel's, a CPU company (which is free, i.e. nothing comes out of your paycheck for that plan...this is true for at least the Portland metro area in which Genentech and Intel have a significant presence in Hillsboro). Maybe if they would get rid of all the waste and upper level management that don't seem to do much except look out for themselves they'd be able to afford at least a free HMO healthcare to all employees.

Explore other reviews about Genentech

5.0
6 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great salary and team! The interview process was smooth and effective.

Cons

To be determined, but so far many alignment meetings. Some folks have frustuations around the re-org and strategy changes.

3.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genentech's origin story and mission are genuinely inspiring — few companies can point to such a meaningful historical arc in medicine. Patient engagement is taken seriously and feels authentic, not performative. The campus is beautiful and the culture has real warmth.

Cons

DDA is operating with significant gaps. First, the foundational data infrastructure is not mature enough to support the ambitions being set for the team. Second, the measurement culture has gotten ahead of the methodology, and no one in a position of authority seems to be asking hard questions about whether the numbers actually mean what they're being presented as meaning. Third, some management feel disconnected from the work itself, lacking the knowledge, hands-on experience, or relevant credentials. Individually any one of these would be manageable. Together these create an environment where it's hard to do rigorous work, rather work is performative, and be recognized for it.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All