Horrible place to work - Production Enhancement Engineer Halliburton Employee Review

1.0
29 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The money while I worked as a cement engineer was okay although if you calculate your salary vs the hours you actually work, its below minimum wage which Halliburton has gotten into trouble for multiple times. I worked in Cement for 4 years before moving to Production Enhancement for 1 year.

Cons

The first year was terrible as they would "haze" the new engineers to toughen them up. They would send me to the worst jobs at all hours of the night and then expect me to be in the office the next morning at 8 am. I was salary without bonuses for that first year. I calculated my hourly rate with all of the extra hours I worked to be around $4/hr. I never complained because I was young and fresh out of college and thought that was how the world worked. Come to find out after I left the company, that even though I was salary, I still should have been paid overtime. What they were doing was illegal. As a woman, they never gave me opportunities to move up and improve. They said the only way to get a promotion was to move into a new department and start over with my training which would take at least a year. So that's what I did. I moved and right when I was about to finish my year of training, the market dropped and they let me go so they wouldn't have to pay my new increased salary. Another con is that I was harassed during my last year while I was in training in the new department (production enhancement). I reported it to HR, they swept it under the rug and I was let go without severance less than 2 months later. After working at this company with zero problems for 5 years, no write ups, exemplary reviews by my superiors, and always on call, they let me go without warning and no safety net at the end of the month. Of course I fought for my unemployment which they tried to deny, but since they had no case, the judge awarded me full benefits. I wish I had sued. Also the work/life balance is terrible Old Boy's club Only 1 woman executive when I was working and it was for HR and she was best friends with the CEO's wife. All other leadership positions were male with 1 exception. As an international company comprising of 80,000 employees, it was pretty telling.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All