Good company, needs to stop hiring former GE managers - Engineering Manager Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
8 Nov 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay and benefits. Strong retirement (401K) contribution program and stock awards. Very challenging technical problems to solve. Good co-workers and supportive front line leaders. Invests good money into solving technical problems.

Cons

Middle management is poorly trained and practice micromanagement like it is the only way to go. Political infighting between silos (e.g. supply chain versus operations versus technology) is very unproductive. Most of the problems I have observed have originated with former GE managers who were hired in. I previously thought that GE should be looked at as a source of best management practice, but that is obviously not the case. These guys are shallow, unreasonable, very poorly trained in soft skills, political to the point of dysfunction. The good news is that this seems to be mainly focused in the Technology groups and not the rest of the organization - yet. So I would recommend working for Halliburton, but be prepared to deal with an overbearing middle management crew that tried to cover their own shortcomings by beating up on those beneath them.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
12 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Halliburton looks strong on the outside, especially on a resume, and the brand name still carries weight in the industry. Some teams work on interesting projects, and if you get a fair manager, you can learn a lot about large-scale B2B operations.

Cons

If you land under the wrong manager, performance improvement plans (PIPs) can be used as a weapon, not a coaching tool. I was put on a PIP that contained inaccurate claims even after I shared detailed evidence and context. I provided several solid pieces of documentation to HR to rebut the accusations, yet nothing meaningful was investigated or corrected in my case. HR felt more like a shield for management than a neutral party. In my experience, they protected internal politics instead of looking at facts and evidence. There is a culture of quiet compliance. Many people stay 10+ years because the pay and brand are “safe,” but they are hesitant to challenge unfair treatment or speak up about toxic behavior. Corporate hierarchy is heavy, and real decisions seem to depend more on who is backing your manager than on actual performance or documented facts.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All