employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Meaningful Work Supporting Harvard College Students - Development Assistant Harvard University Employee Review

4.0
5 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This role supports frontline fundraisers in the Faculty of Arts & Sciences with a focus on Harvard College students. The mission, colleagueship, and the university president’s efforts are overall highly valued. Colleagues can be described as skilled, supportive, and approachable. The position also benefits from being part of a union.

Cons

It’s a fast‑paced environment, and things can become hectic when negative media headlines spark sudden surges in workload. Opportunities for Development Assistants to advance internally are limited. Most move into a coordinator position or shift over to Operations. Earning an Assistant Director role or higher is difficult, even with long tenure.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
25 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A PhD is always very advisor/PI dependent, but I had a great experience with room to learn, grow, and explore interesting research questions. As with any PhD program you’ll work pretty hard for relatively lower pay and perhaps less directly applicable industry career trajectory at the end, but if you find good people to tackle the journey with and get to work on interesting problems I personally think the journey is worthwhile!

Cons

Less of a program wide cohort in my particular engineering field. Some funding challenges with the govt last year but seem mostly back now, apart from the recent administration issues funding wasn’t generally a challenge

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You work with experts from every field possible in science from Mechanobiology to Metallurgy and working as a ML intern along with scientists from different fields gave me a lot of exposure and how to work in a research department.

Cons

One challenge encountered was maintaining a clear focus on training objectives, as the evolving parameters required continuous reassessment of the model's learning priorities. Additionally, the absence of established ground truth for the domain presented a limitation in validating and guiding the approach effectively.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All