Disappointing, frustrating, and an unclear future - Data Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

1.0
12 Feb 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pros of Health Catalyst are probably similar to other large organizations or bureaucracies. - Decent compensation - I always felt I was adequately paid for the work I did - Decent benefits - Although this has started to change, in general I thought the benefits were still good, if fairly standard - Remote-first - You're able to work from home/anywhere in the US (occasionally abroad, depending on certain factors).

Cons

Sadly, I would not recommend anyone to join Health Catalyst; my experience was one of consistent frustration and disappointment, leading to my departure as soon as I could manage it. In no particular order: - Technology - Much of HC's tech stack is antiquated, and the migration to the "new-and-improved" platform that was promised still has not materialized. As others have noted, this means that you will be WAY behind the curve when applying to jobs at other companies in the future. HC also heavily relies on in-house tools, rendering huge portions of their codebase and software opaque and difficult to understand, even for the people who work with them every day. - Management - Senior executives and leaders pronounce a largely positive message that conflicts jarringly with the struggles of lower-level employees and individual contributors. Turnover among the C-suite and SVPs contributes to a sense of the company being rudderless. Direct managers and team leads often are unable to manage conflict that is sometimes necessary, and many don't seem to possess much expertise or experience beyond simply having been at HC for a long time. - Culture - HC's culture (or lack thereof) always baffled me. Despite professing to be a remote-first company, there was little thought given or effort made to create and grow relationships among team members. For example, most people don't put their cameras on in Zoom meetings; even if mine is on, everyone else remains a faceless name on a screen. HC's focus on ideas like "assume positive intent" have unfortunately morphed into an extreme aversion to conflict and tough conversations. Managers may acknowledge challenges and problems in private, but then there will be no follow-up or action to actually address them. Speaking from personal experience, I was promised that things would change over and over again; eventually, you realize they won't and decide to leave. - Business and organization - Even in my short time at HC, I saw at least 4-6 companies acquired under varying rationales. It was never clear how the companies were meant to integrate with what were supposedly HC's core technologies and products, or how the company meant to develop its new platform when so much money was going to acquisitions. Similarly, despite having enough money for a 5% company-wide raise and acquisitions at the end of 2024, January 2025 saw another round of layoffs, the third in less than two years. I never quite learned what exactly it was HC did, and I have no idea what exactly they're hoping to do in the future.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
1y
Thank you for your comprehensive feedback. And, thank you for the time and work you put in as a team member of Health Catalyst. First, to address your concern about an outdated tech stack, I am excited about the progress we have made with our next-generation data and analytics platform, Ignite, to ensure that we are using the latest, best-in-class technology in our work with our clients. I’m encouraged by the progress we have made with Ignite since launching the new platform a year ago. Ignite is part of an integrated solution, driving outcomes in our five key focus areas and supporting the success of our applications and accelerators. The strategy we are executing against positions Ignite as a central element of this integrated approach, highlighting its potential to stitch together multiple offerings and drive incremental value. Going further, we believe that to bring the best solutions to our clients, we must create and maintain in a more modular fashion across all our technology products. I find it truly exciting to take a fresh look at all the amazing work that has been done, much of it embedded within vertically integrated products, and then imagine a new innovative future where we have horizontal capabilities "plugging and playing" across many cohesively packaged business solutions that can be rapidly deployed to clients. This exciting work is kicking off in earnest now and will extend into our 2025 execution. Next, I recognize the difficulties of building connections in a remote-first culture. We have heard from some team members that collaboration is more difficult being remote, and there is value in “connecting” live rather than by Zoom. But, for the most part, continuing to be remote-first works well for us—our team member engagement continues to be high. In our most recent Gallup survey, we ranked in the 94th percentile. I would be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge and share my gratitude for the community-building efforts of the leaders of our affinity groups, each offering regular, meaningful opportunities to connect. I also want to acknowledge that there is tension, and sometimes tradeoffs required, as we try to find a balance in providing value to each of three stakeholder groups – team members, clients, and shareholders. The past few years have certainly been challenging to navigate, and I’m confident that we, as a leadership team, have not been perfect in that navigation. We remained committed to acknowledge, with transparency, both the positives, as well as the negatives, with a goal not to be hollow or to put a corporate spin on our communication. I’m sorry to hear that you felt our communication didn’t fully achieve our goal. We’ll keep trying to become better, which includes working to better address both the challenges and the reasons for optimism. In addition, I wanted to address your advice that we should find more opportunities for professional growth. I want to share that promotions are still considered as needed, with a bias toward promoting from within. I am grateful we’ve seen nearly 900 promotions-from-within occur at Health Catalyst over the past 3 ½ years. Again, I appreciate your contributions to our success and the thorough feedback you provided for us to consider. I wish you all the best in your next chapter. - Dan Burton

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
9 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Before 2025, the company's benefits and leadership were excellent.

Cons

As of 2025, all benefits have been suspended until the end of the year.

1
avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We appreciate your recognition of the strengths the company had before this year and the dedication of team members during challenging times. As we shape our 2026 strategy, we’re carefully evaluating how we allocate resources to ensure organizational success, identifying where to invest and how to utilize those resources most effectively, all guided by a clear and focused plan. Your feedback is helpful, and we will continue to communicate updates as progress is made. -Ben Albert
3.0
5 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All