Too small to function - Anonymous employee Help Musicians Employee Review

1.0
15 May 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This cause is vitally important and some of the staff I worked with were great.

Cons

Are you sitting comfortably? Because the org is the size it is, the Director of the dept. I worked in was Director of 5 other depts. Meaning she was spread too thin and unqualified to direct the team I was in. At more effective organisations there would be multiple 'rungs' between myself and her but since there were not, on the days when I could get an audience with Director, my day-to-day work would often become micro-managed by the CEO himself. A lack of understanding about my area, also meant my expertise was disregarded by these Corporate leaders who should not have been directly involved in my team's work. Due to these things, the turnover of staff in my team was exceedingly high, with very capable and valuable colleagues rarely lasting more than a year. Those staff shortages lead to increased team pressure. Whilst the HR team are good and lovely, they are one of the teams managed by this Director, so any formal complaint about either structure or an unpleasant culture is of course ill advised. A mess - strongly advise against working for Help Musicians.

Explore other reviews about Help Musicians

3.0
31 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

= Good compensation = Nice people = Easy work

Cons

= Slow moving = Lack of career progression = Not motivating = Not fast paced or agile

3.0
18 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- nice central offices - some really energised, dynamic creative team members (sadly too many work to rule, going through the motions and clearly bored) - best efforts made to match services with need of beneficiaries - really trying to get ahead of the curve but always falling just behind it - genuine effort by workers to team build via a Fun Club with lot of activities organised - generous pension scheme - toil given for all overtime

Cons

- very hierarchical structure - only lip service played to diversity particularly at board level - very few opportunities for prof development -with a preference for highly paid interims some of whom have had to be carefully managed as not aligned with the cause and have caused disruption - junior roles carry lots of responsibility not commensurate with their low salaries, eventually if good and bright they leave - lots of hands off strategy makers - no opp to feed back no 360 reviews - a staff forum was set up but has turned out not to be a genuine vehicle for staff feedback and has been derailed with weighty matters that should be dealt with by the HR function - sadly a fear culture dominates with staff members ill inclined to say what they really think or speak up as there is no channel for doing this - stifled, resulting in poor growth as emphasis and focus are often on the wrong things. - myopic and inward looking rather than empowering a growth mindset which will take in some failure - very risk averse, prevents creativity and real growth

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All