The Bottom Line is All That Matters - Software Developer Infor Employee Review

2.0
2 Apr 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Owns/produces some well designed software and tools. • Some good use of up-to-date tools, like git and AWS. • Pay is OK, until after a few years with no increase.

Cons

• Cares very little about its prime assets: its production employees. • Does not provide sufficient numbers of employees to meet the high demands to enhance the software, so it goes out with lots of bugs. • Stole PTO from thousands of employees when it suddenly announced it was going to a "DTO" plan (Discretionary Time Off), without compensating for accumulated PTO. • Suddenly changed bonus structure for jobs that relied on major overtime work to make expected income, causing hundreds of employees to lose major percentages of annual income. • Closed many offices, sending employees to work from home. Recently stopped paying for internet and use of personal phone for work. Will not provide decent hardware nor funds to purchase it when working from home (such as monitors or phone headsets). • Horrible lack of communication with management. I have spoken to the person to whom I supposedly report to only once, and that was only because it was a personal emergency. No sense of belonging, or encouragement toward common goals. • No performance reviews. Ever. For anyone I know here. For YEARS.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
26 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much volatility Work life balance Strong culture

Cons

Big company, slow to change Heavy bureaucracy Nepotism

3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All