Great flexibility, but resistant to change - Software Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

4.0
20 Jun 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great schedule flexibility, ample vacation - Many different projects to work on - Appear open and encouraging of location changes and project switches, if you want that for your career. Opportunities to move around within company

Cons

- Lots of projects tied to old tech - Some folks resistant to change and new technology/methodologies - Health benefits could be better - No pay/bonus incentive for software managers

avatar
L3Harris Response
6y
Thanks for your feedback! We love to see that you have enjoyed your work/life balance and that you have experienced many great opportunities to grow and develop your career at L3Harris. We also want to hear about ways we can improve the employee experience. We will be launching our Employee Engagement Survey very soon, and we hope you participate to push us to continuously improve.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
6 Apr 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Cons

The workplace was old and outdated.

2.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All