High Turnover - Technical Writer - Associate L3Harris Employee Review

3.0
2 Jul 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pleasant to work with colleagues. Very friendly supervisors.

Cons

Lots of people leave after a short amount of time due to the pay. Raises are low. Training is all OTJ and very substandard. Contracts are so tight there isn't much room to teach and learn. Not much room for process improvement on government contracts.

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
Thanks for leaving us a review. Raises are evaluated during each performance cycle and determined by each employee's performance from the previous year. If you require additional training or would like to discuss more ways to develop in your role, we urge you to reach out to your manager or HR Business Partner to discuss the opportunities available to you.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
12 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work of life balance was amazing

Cons

Could run out of work due to it being contracts.

2.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All