The worst healthcare benefits you will ever have - Chief Software Architect Leidos Employee Review

1.0
5 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Plenty of interesting work being done throughout the company. - Some very competent and hard-working technical personnel.

Cons

- Leidos' gutted its (already meager) healthcare benefits in 2013. Some of my prescriptions cost hundreds of dollars to refill a month. My pharmacists couldn't believe how much I was paying for some medications. The company's lack of communication throughout this transition was completely abhorrent. They refused to have any meetings to discuss the sweeping changes. - I watched half of our 150 person organization get laid off without receiving any severance package whatsoever. I survived the layoffs, but decided I did not want to work for a company that would treat its employees like this. Luckily I don't anymore. - Lack of any significant career advancement opportunities if you work at one of the facilities that aren't in VA or San Diego. - Leidos gave our team $35 gift cards for our 3 year anniversary with the company, which we were required to pay taxes on. Who was the person who decided against rounding up to $50? - Leidos' senior management were complicit in defrauding the city of New York $500 million in 2011. Where did they get the money to pay the city back? They withheld bonuses for front-line staff, of course.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All