The modern Wild West of IT - IT Service Delivery Manager Leidos Employee Review

1.0
17 May 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some small pockets of the company that are collaborative and trying to innovate and progress which will generally be under a specific manager. If you can get into a team that wants to work with the client rather than see them as the enemy then there is opportunity to do good things. There is strong support for our Defence community and you can be eligible for an RDO a month.

Cons

The company is just one big cesspool of bullying, creative reporting to cover yourself and blame. Snr management and executive is very much based around control through the creation of trusted possies/boys clubs to promote the illusion that everything is wonderful and Leidos is a great place to work, while behind the scenes, in meeting rooms and on phone calls the dark underbelly of life at Leidos plays out by these trusted individuals where there is no record of proceedings. Between teams and business units there is close to open warfare where there has to be a winner to every engagement which removes any opportunity of collaboration, respect or innovation.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
21 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits and career pathing

Cons

No cons that I can think of

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All