Rocket ship! Get on board. - Human Resources Director Leidos Employee Review

5.0
20 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong Reputation: Leidos is a well-established and respected name in the defense, intelligence, and civil markets. This can provide job security and career stability. Diverse Portfolio: Leidos works on a wide range of projects, offering opportunities to gain experience in various fields like cybersecurity, IT, engineering, and more. Career Development: Leidos may offer opportunities for professional development, such as training programs, mentorship, and potential for advancement within the company. Competitive Benefits: Leidos typically offers competitive benefits packages, which may include health insurance, retirement plans, and paid time off. Impactful Work: Many Leidos projects contribute to important national security and societal missions, which can be fulfilling for employees.

Cons

Bureaucracy: As a large company, Leidos may have layers of bureaucracy that can slow down decision-making and hinder innovation. Contract-Driven Work: A significant portion of Leidos' work is based on government contracts, which can lead to project uncertainties and potential job instability. Large Company Culture: Some employees may find the large company culture impersonal or lacking in strong team cohesion. Work-Life Balance: Depending on the specific role and project, work-life balance can be challenging, especially during peak periods or on demanding projects. Compensation: While competitive in some areas, compensation may not always be at the top of the market compared to smaller companies or competitors in certain fields.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All