Veneer of a positive, supportive culture - Anonymous employee MCG Health Employee Review

2.0
13 Mar 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Quality employees who give their all each day and take pride in their work.

Cons

Agree with review from “Technologist” with out of touch leadership, technical debt, underresourced teams. Too many avoidable bugs because of rushed/hacked jobs. A number of employees avoid work, take credit for other people’s work, or unload work on others. Deadlines on big projects get missed time and again but not much accountability. It’s always someone else’s fault or out of anyone’s control. Passive aggressiveness is pervasive. Many people are remote but if you are based in Seattle, working from home is frowned upon (altho leadership recently sent a notice that they are working on letting sick people with colds work from home).

avatar
MCG Health Response
7y
Thank you for your honest review, and for sharing this info in the HR survey. We are uncertain why you are saying WFH is frowned upon in the Seattle office as that is not the case. An email from HR which was sent to the entire staff in September 2018 clearly indicated WFH was allowed as long as an employee is in good standing and has approval from their manager.

Explore other reviews about MCG Health

5.0
4 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Highly focused vision and great culture of transparency!

Cons

Unpopular opinion, but I wish we worked more in-person

avatar
MCG Health Response
2mo
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback! We’re really glad to hear that our focus and commitment to transparency are resonating. That’s something we care deeply about and continue to invest in. We also appreciate your perspective on in-person collaboration. We recognize that different working styles suit different people, and we’re always exploring ways to create meaningful opportunities for connection while maintaining flexibility for our team. Feedback like yours helps us strike that balance. Thanks again for sharing your experience!
2.0
12 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

strong and meaningful mission and has historically been a respected leader in our field. Some talented engineers and operators care deeply about the product and customers.

Cons

Over the past few months, engineering leadership (new CTO especially) has made disruptive organizational and process changes without adequately understanding existing workstreams, dependencies, or operational realities. Critical hires were blocked or reshaped under a “startup mentality” without clear analysis of actual team needs, and a central operating team we all relied on across engineering was dismantled with no due diligence, transition planning, or communication, creating gaps in ownership and support. Rigid, consultant-driven “SAFe” frameworks are being introduced without evidence they would improve delivery or reliability. Leadership has shown little willingness to incorporate new information or adjust course when presented with concrete risks, raising concern that engineers will be held accountable for outages caused by top-down structural decisions. Together, these changes increase the risk of customer-facing support issues and both technical and professional instability.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All