employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Engaged employer

Management Either Clueless or Doesn't Care - Applications Analyst MD Anderson Cancer Center Employee Review

2.0
23 Jan 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Free Fitness Center on-site • Benefits (healthcare, retirement) are good • Quick increase in number of PTO days per year based on length of employment at institution • Changing positions internally is not frowned upon; a surprising number of employees in many positions came from another position within the institution

Cons

• No progression for high achievers; spend enough time and get promoted; slow career and salary growth if you stay; lots of talent ends up leaving • Lack of telecommuting option or highly restricted telecommuting for IT positions • Lack of follow-through by management; say one thing, do another; example – committee of employees convened to discuss why morale is so low and nothing ever came of the committee’s results • Feeling that management says they care but actually do not. Morale has been low for over a year (since the 10% layoff) and the few things that have been done are like bandages on a severed artery. • Over-reliance on contractors who receive telecommute rights and higher pay than actual employees while remaining at the institution well past the ends of their projects • Loyalty to the institution is not valued • Time tracking of salaried employees is required and monitored for some departments • Decision-making and project approvals are very political • Must pay for parking in hospital-owned garage

Explore other reviews about MD Anderson Cancer Center

5.0
24 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good atmosphere and good people

Cons

no cons great place to be

3.0
30 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Its mission to cure cancer is great. The research in some labs is groundbreaking.

Cons

There are hand few departments that do weird hiring of people of a specific demographic only (not mentioning which). Most PI s are of that said demographic. And some labs on this department don’t hire people within the US who are truly deserving just because they must hire people from that said demographic from that country. The Chair and Professors openly communicate in non English. So for any other demographic it is hard to secure employment, hard to understand what is being said. One PI forces their ethnic culture on lab members and can ruin your life if you don’t play along. Very little time is spent by some Professors doing research. They mostly write grants and create some preliminary results for a work to write more grants. Even in funding shortage times a lot of research allocated money is spent by some PIs to unnecessarily travel to international conferences frequently making it paid vacations which ideally are suposed academic endeavors. Oncologists have less attitude than the dry lab scientists often.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All