Great for a short tenure but not fantastic in the longer run - Project Manager MDeC Employee Review

3.0
25 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Ability to work on talent development initiatives for Malaysia 2. Ability to work extensively across public and private sector 3. Ability to travel across multiple states in Malaysia 4. Ability to influence strategy and programatic development of digital initiatives carried by public and private sector

Cons

1. Impact Measurement : MDEC measures impact primarily from a quantitative standpoint with no measure of quality. Quantiative measures usually include number of participants that attended a program with details such as full names, IC number, and signature. Such measures are open to both external and internal abuse which casts doubt on the actual impact. 2. No room for further growth : Hard to be promoted to senior level management as longer term employees tend to stay for a long time 3. Hard to get rid of underperforming employees : MDEC reeks of underperforming employees who have overstayed their tenure 4. MDEC's hands are tied to the government of the day. Overall direction and budget comes from the central government. If there is no budget available, its hard to get promotions, hire new staff or implement new projects 5. Friday is half day : There are various employees who come back and chill out after lunch and wrap up for the week 6. MDEC is a great place to be complacent as evidenced by the longer term employees who've stayed there for at least 7-10 years. Its a clock in clock out attitutde but who can blame them as the environment can be less inspiring after a few years 7. Administrative functions like HR, Finance and Legal don't seem to talk to each other

Explore other reviews about MDeC

4.0
17 Jun 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good environment to work in

Cons

Hours are long and work late

1.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Internally it often feels like an organisation trying to lead the digital economy while struggling to manage its own house. The culture can be highly political, with unclear direction, moving goalposts, and leadership priorities that seem to change depending on who is in the room. A lot is said about innovation, transformation, and national impact, but internally, employees can be left dealing with poor structure, weak support, and very little clarity. For an agency that speaks so much about digital transformation, the internal experience can feel surprisingly outdated. Processes are slow, decision-making is unclear, and employees are often expected to deliver “national-level” outcomes without national-level resources, benefits, or support. The benefits are not particularly attractive, especially when compared to the workload, pressure, and expectations placed on staff. It can feel like employees are expected to carry big mandates with small support, while internal politics takes up more space than actual execution. The industry perception is also not as strong as the branding suggests. Many external stakeholders appear to engage because they need to, not because they genuinely see MDEC as the gold standard for innovation leadership.

Cons

Political culture, racism, unclear leadership direction, weak employee support, limited benefits, inconsistent HR practices, resource gaps, and a lot of performative transformation talk. Useless CEO, CFO and HR. Causing the collapse of MDEC. Useless and. Zero output to the industry and good at only doing events.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All