Unprofessional, some poorly qualified employees, unproductive environment - Anonymous employee Mendeley Employee Review

1.0
17 May 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fun office culture with a focus on health. Free fruit and vegetables and other food, encourages employees to ride bikes, flexible office hours, fun events and opportunity for creative projects.

Cons

- Undermining Elsevier. This was the most disturbing part of this job. Even though they're owned by Elsevier, they would badmouth/ridicule Elsevier at every opportunity. I had to deal with Elsevier a lot, and I was consistently told to promise Elsevier what they asked for and then ignore them and do what Mendeley wanted. I was deeply uncomfortable with that, since I was working with high level management in Elsevier with whom I got along very well, and lying to them could hurt my career opportunities. - Unprofessional behavior. For example, employees denigrating Elsevier representatives and trainers via a private chat channel, while those people are sitting right in front of them. Or employees putting on 'cat ears' on their webcam during teleconference meetings. - Lack of resources. There were no phones, and we received no company mobile phone. We were expected to use our own mobile phones, at our own cost, to make calls. We had to use our personal Skype accounts as well. The office was so loud, at times I had to have teleconferences in the broom closet just to hear our client. Hard to do work on Fridays as well, when you're still working on a project and they're blaring loud music through the office and getting drunk from the office fridge filled with beer. - One employee in higher management who was perpetually "home sick" allegedly had health issues, but I soon learned those health issues often involved being hungover from drinking until 5am. One time I came along. I showed up on time the next morning, despite two hours of sleep. HR asked what had happened the last night. I told the truth. Only to be reprimanded when that employee came in hungover at 2pm and was furious to learn that I hadn't covered up for them. - Underqualified employees. Software developers were very talented. Management and social media team were wildly incompetent. They seemed to have no qualifications to do their job, and were highly resistant to learning even the most simple software. They would waste weeks of developers' time demanding that they develop special tools to make it easier for them to manage web content. At some point I developed a system for them to use, through the same software the rest of the office used, and they simply refused to even try it. They managed tickets in Excel spreadsheets because they thought ticketing software was too complicated. I was amazed upper management allowed that to continue. - The social media team could've been replaced by a single competent person, they did so little work. Anytime I'd try to do some work for them because I was bored out of my mind and I knew it would take them days, I'd get reprimanded because that's "their job", not mine. - Because a lot of people were more interested in partying and getting drunk with the CEO at lunchtime than work, I once sat in the office for a week, listening to an audiobook, pretending to work. Nobody noticed. I couldn't get actual work done because all my projects were awaiting input from others, who were too busy doing... nothing in particular from what I could see. Since they didn't want me to 'undermine' others by doing their work for them, and since they didn't want me to "take on too many projects", I just sat there doing nothing. - Stealing work / plagiarism! One employee had allegedly been working on a project for 6 months. I was working on something similar, and got it done in a week. He asked me for a copy, just two days before his big project was due. When he presented his big project, I was shocked to see it was MY work, with no more than 1% added. No credit given. When I protested, I was told we're supposed to work as a team, so I should be happy my work was useful to him. NO IDEA what he'd spent those six months doing. By far the most unprofessional work environment I've ever seen.

avatar
Mendeley Response
8y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review of Mendeley. I can only apologise if your experience with us didn’t measure up to the high standards we aim for in the organisation. We’re appalled at some of the behaviour you’ve outlined, and want to be crystal clear that it’s not the culture or organisation we’re building as we continue to grow and invest in the Mendeley brand and people. Mendeley has undergone a transformation in the past year with a revamped management structure and we’re continually looking to improve how we serve researchers; how we support and nurture our staff; and how we make Mendeley a great place to work where people can solve real problems in a fast-paced, empowered environment. I’d be very interested to discuss your experience some more so that we could ensure we use it as a learning exercise for our teams and culture. If you’d be interested in this, please reach out to me at mendeleygdrev@elsevier.com. Terence Clifton, VP Technology, Mendeley

Explore other reviews about Mendeley

1.0
8 Oct 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of free food, drinking during lunch hour, not much work to do on many teams.

Cons

Employees don't take their job seriously. My team lead called in sick constantly when they were actually just out drinking late at night. Many employees are not remotely skilled at their job and only seem interested in socializing and partying. The company has never been profitable and the CEO said they had no intention of being profitable, they just wanted to sell to a bigger company, which they did, Elsevier. But they had no interest in supporting Elsevier's mission. I got put on some work groups with Elsevier and was instructed to just say yes to whatever they asked, and then not implement anything and put them off if they asked for updates. I was extremely uncomfortable with this, since Elsevier would have been where I'd need to go for promotions. During Elsevier trainings, employees paid no attention whatsoever, instead just chatting with each other on their phones under the table, and making fun of the Elsevier trainings in their private chat channel. Total joke.

4.0
18 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The project work was interesting and engineers had a strong involvement with the DevOps side of the process, being responsible for the infrastructure for their own services, (within the guidelines set by the operations team). Most, if not all, teams had embraced agile ways of working and the continuous deployment to Production meant that it was quick to get code changes released once they'd been through the review process. The company had a bit of a feel of a start-up but seemed well established in its product(s) and where it was heading. There was a decent sized kitchen space with table football and table tennis, and a good social atmosphere within the office.

Cons

There were one or two people who tended to be the last to arrive at the office in the morning and the first to leave at the end of the day. Combined with playing table football, (particularly Friday afternoons), they didn't really delivery very much software. This may be normal within an office of that size, but it seemed unfair that they got away with it, while their colleagues at a similar level worked hard and didn't always get recognised for the notable difference in value that they brought.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All