Associate - Anonymous employee Mintz Employee Review

3.0
15 Jun 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very smart and driven folks leading the management team who have focused on lateral partner recruitment resulting in a huge increase in revenue and profits per partner over the past 3 years. Well respected for certain practice areas and ML Strategies, its government relations/lobbying subsidiary, has heavy hitters who are very well connected and are singularly responsible for the Wynn Casino and GE relocation projects. That is the true gem of the firm and it generates business for various sections, particularly real estate. MLS and Bob Popeo have given the firm a well-earned reputation as a kover and shaker and player in Boston politics, business and real estate development.

Cons

The firm has focused too much on lateral partner growth and has let many tremendously talented and respected senior lawyers go elsewhere. The firm has way too many people performing virtually the same jobs in business development/HR mostly with limited success. A streamlined effort could be more efficient and successful. Management cares little about associates unless you somehow get linked with a key partner. The off track associates are virtually ignored, are paid far less than their on track counterparts while being expected to bill the same hours. Off trackers are also not permitted to participate in the firm's retirement plan. Management of some sections is strong. Some sections have very poor managers who are too busy with their own practices to manage and hire flunky middle men to try to do it for them. Not effective.

Explore other reviews about Mintz

5.0
13 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People, ability to work across practice groups, commitment to DEI and pro bono

Cons

Difficult to bring in smaller clients

1.0
26 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It is Cravath Salary Scale

Cons

it has the highest turnover in Boston Big Law for a reason: Higher billable requirements than almost any other firm in Boston; Horrible reputation (both culture and with clients) on the corporate side; Abusive reputation; Very long partnership track (12 years); Unlikely to hit billable hour requirements unless on the M&A team; Very low client retention, especially on the ecvc side; no centralized staffing; Poor support with very few paralegals (and very high paralegal turnover); Losing steam over the last few years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All