Strong global brand but poor internal culture and leadership - Software Engineer Moody's Employee Review

4.0
5 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

stable company with a strong global reputation

Cons

Although the company has a strong global brand, the experience within my organization has been disappointing. The biggest concern is the leadership culture. There have been no meaningful promotions for many employees over the last five years, and many people are afraid to raise concerns because they worry about their job security. Since RMS was acquired by Moody's, many former RMS employees appear to be working under constant pressure. Employees do not feel comfortable discussing career growth or asking for promotions with senior leadership. The management structure is also confusing. There seem to be multiple layers of Senior Managers reporting to other Senior Managers, resulting in excessive oversight and micromanagement rather than efficient decision-making. Another major issue is the disconnect between senior leadership and employees. Managing Directors and Directors rarely interact with junior staff or listen to their concerns. HR is also not visible or approachable when employees need support. There is also a perceived double standard in the return-to-office policy. Many senior leaders continue to work remotely while requiring junior employees to come into the office regularly. A company's reputation is built not only on its brand name but also on how it treats its employees. Without transparent communication, fair career growth, and accountable leadership, even a well-known brand can lose the trust and motivation of its workforce.

Explore other reviews about Moody's

5.0
14 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, life-work balance, culture, and growth opportunities

Cons

Standard large company challenges (slow decisioning, delays, etc)

3.0
1 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good company wide culture (see notes below on ratings specific culture) good people - Great work life balance (especially for finance in NYC) - Opportunity to learn from most of the c-suite - If you want the return offer you can usually get it (only know one person from my year who wanted one and didn't get one). - The ratings intern program is essentially gauging if your competent to extend a return offer. You don't actually do much work for your team.

Cons

- Can't touch anything an actual associate does because of regulations in industry (don't get exposure with what you'll actually be doing full time). - Because you can't touch anything you basically spend the entire summer being talked at by senior analysts (learned a ton but can get repetitive). - Hybrid schedule is only really adhered to by associates on your team, so the office feels deserted at times. The seniors don't come into the office much. The ratings floors (separate from the rest of the business) have a stale and silent feeling. - Because you don't really do much for your team it's hard to create relationships with them. - Your capstone project can be on a completely different industry then the one you're assigned to.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All