Novelis: A Case Study on the Effect of Napoleon Complex in Corporate America - Anonymous employee Novelis Employee Review

1.0
19 Jul 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have free soft drinks at the Atlanta headquarters. Even that is essentially a con as they squeeze the plants on OpEx to pay for said soft drinks, $100k Christmas parties for the Atlanta office, etc.

Cons

This company treats employees as though they are consumable parts. After not paying a bonus in FY13 due to missing the EBITDA threshold by 1% (arguably the direct result of Phil Marten's (CEO) decision to go live on SAP too early and not listen to his project team), they treated the few employees who haven't left with a whooping 2.5% merit increase for FY14. And while Phil stated that no bonus would be paid in FY13 this is a half truth. He left out the fact that je and other members of senior management receive LTIP which is essentially a bonus. It is a shame as at one point in time this company had genuine talent. I question the intelligence of anyone who still works there after being continually slapped in the face by Phil.

Explore other reviews about Novelis

5.0
17 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture. Laid back manufacturing.

Cons

Novelis is still a large corporation. Same as any other.

1.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The strongest part of Novelis is the people at the working level. There are a lot of smart, capable, and genuinely friendly employees across the business who are willing to collaborate and help each other succeed in a challenging environment. The company also offers a relatively flexible hybrid work policy compared to many industrial/manufacturing organizations, which helps with work-life balance. Benefits are generally competitive and above average for the industry.

Cons

The employee experience has become increasingly difficult due to constant reorganizations, unclear ownership structures, and growing pressure to deliver more work with fewer resources. High performers are often rewarded with additional responsibilities without meaningful increases in compensation, title progression, or organizational support. Many functions operate in a constant state of firefighting, with priorities regularly shifting based on operational issues or leadership changes. There is also a disconnect between leadership messaging and the day-to-day experience for employees. Collaboration and empowerment are emphasized, but decision-making often feels centralized and reactive. Career progression can feel inconsistent and heavily dependent on timing, politics, or leadership turnover rather than performance alone. Morale across the organization has suffered as workloads have increased while teams remain lean. Employees are frequently expected to absorb responsibilities outside of their original scope, and strategic or long-term thinking often takes a back seat to immediate operational pressures.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All