Analytical Sciences, KSA, SABIC - Scientist SABIC Employee Review

I would like to raise serious concerns about the current situation in the Analytical Sciences Department at KSA (Riyadh and Jubail). The department is facing major leadership and organizational challenges that are negatively affecting both the work environment and the quality of scientific output. 1. Leadership and Work Environment The department lacks effective management and leadership. The work environment has become increasingly toxic due to poor managerial practices and internal favoritism. Many talented scientists have already left the department because they were discouraged by this environment. The current managers act as “bosses” rather than true leaders, focusing on authority instead of team development or innovation. 2. Data Reliability and Technical Competence There are serious issues with the reliability of analytical data. Some analyses are reported without proper experimental validation, primarily due to a shortage of skilled staff and lack of oversight. This compromises the credibility of results and damages the department’s scientific reputation. 3. Bias and Lack of Career Development Career progression within the department is largely dependent on managerial nominations rather than merit or measurable performance. Unfortunately, there appears to be bias and favoritism — particularly an internal lobby that disadvantages non-Indian employees. As a result, career development opportunities are minimal for many scientists, regardless of their qualifications or achievements. 4. Unfair Evaluation Practices The annual performance evaluation system is perceived as unfair and subjective. Managers often misuse the “SABIC Values” assessment criteria to penalize employees rather than to promote growth. This practice has led to demotivation and mistrust among staff. 5. Misuse of Resources and Time Managers frequently schedule unnecessary meetings, seemingly to create the appearance of activity and engagement, rather than to achieve meaningful outcomes. Additionally, there have been instances where promotions were manipulated — for example, a technician being advanced to a professional level due to personal favors rather than merit.