Great co-workers overshadowed by toxic management issues - SIU Supervisor Selective Insurance Employee Review

1.0
1 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Co-workers are good, depending on your department. The people that have been there a long time are great. Newcomers, not so much.

Cons

It used to be great company but after several retirements of upper management it has now turned to a toxic environment. Unrealistic expectations from leaders that have never done the job. Very toxic. High workload and micromanagement. Stay away if you want to keep good health. People are put into positions they are not qualified to fill. Complaints filed and nothing done to correct situation. Several long term employees leaving because they can't stand what it has become.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
17 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All